Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
STOP-DUB is a multicenter randomized clinical trial that is assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation (EA) for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in women for whom medical management has not provided relief.
The Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB) is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial that assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation (EA) for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in women for whom medical management has not provided relief. Institutional review board-approved study sites included the coordinating center, chair's office, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and 33 clinical centers in the United States and Canada. STOP-DUB enrolled (1) 237 eligible patients for whom medical treatment had not been successful and who were randomized to either hysterectomy or EA; and (2) an observational cohort of 139 patients who were "provisionally ineligible" or who were eligible but did not wish to be randomized. Enrollment began November 25, 1997 and ended June 30, 2001. Randomized women were followed using telephone interviews at least 2 years and observational women were followed a maximum of 6 months. We also collected information on return clinical center visits and hospital bills from the sites directly. The primary outcome addressed by the randomized trial is the impact of surgery on bleeding, pain, fatigue, and the major problem (symptom) that led the woman to seek treatment for her condition, measured 1 year following surgery. Additional outcomes included the impact of surgery at time points after 1 year; changes in quality of life, activity limitation, sexual functioning, and urinary incontinence; surgical complications; additional surgery; and resource utilization. The costs and the relative cost-effectiveness of the two surgeries will be calculated. The main scientific objective for the observational study was to examine changes over time in terms of treatment selected, DUB-related symptoms, and quality of life. Enrolled women signed an informed consent to participate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hysterectomy | Procedure | |||
| endometrial ablation | Procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Randomized trial: Impact of surgery on bleeding, pain, | ||
| fatigue, and major problem (symptom) leading the woman to seek treatment for her condition. | ||
| Observational study: changes over time in treatment selected, DUB-related symptoms, and quality of life. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Randomized trial: Impact of surgery on primary outcomes at time points after 1 year, quality of life, activity limitation, sexual functioning, urinary incontinence, surgical complications, additional surgery, resource utilization. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Prescreen
Eligibility Screen
Medical History
Baseline Gynecologic Examination
Ultrasound Examination
Laboratory and Ancillary Tests
Other
Provisional Eligibility Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kay Dickersin, PhD | Brown University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14500057 | Background | Dickersin K, Munro M, Langenberg P, Scherer R, Frick KD, Weber AM, Johns A, Peipert JF, Clark M; Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding Research Group. Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB): design and methods. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Oct;24(5):591-609. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00023-0. | |
| 9732095 | Background | Weber AM, Munro MG. Endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy: STOP-DUB. Medscape Womens Health. 1998 May;3(3):3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008595 | Menorrhagia |
| D014592 | Uterine Hemorrhage |
| D008796 | Metrorrhagia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007044 | Hysterectomy |
| D055356 | Endometrial Ablation Techniques |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013509 | Gynecologic Surgical Procedures |
| D013519 | Urogenital Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D055011 | Ablation Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 19111789 | Derived | Frick KD, Clark MA, Steinwachs DM, Langenberg P, Stovall D, Munro MG, Dickersin K; STOP-DUB Research Group. Financial and quality-of-life burden of dysfunctional uterine bleeding among women agreeing to obtain surgical treatment. Womens Health Issues. 2009 Jan-Feb;19(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.002. |
| 18055721 | Derived | Dickersin K, Munro MG, Clark M, Langenberg P, Scherer R, Frick K, Zhu Q, Hallock L, Nichols J, Yalcinkaya TM; Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB) Research Group. Hysterectomy compared with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;110(6):1279-89. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000292083.97478.38. |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D006470 | Hemorrhage |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D008599 | Menstruation Disturbances |