The subject's diastolic blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). The average value was calculated for the Baseline and Week 52 visit based on treatment group. The average change was determined by subtracting the average value Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4,8,12,16,20,24,32 and 40.

The subject's pulse was measured in beats per minute (BPM). The average value was calculated per treatment group for the Baseline and Week 52 visit. The average change was determined by subtracting the average value Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

The subject's body weight was measured in kilograms(kg). The average value was calculated for each treatment group for the Baseline and Week 52 visits. The average change was determined by subtracting the average value at the Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant creatine kinase (CK) value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant CK result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had CK labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not. A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant ALT value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant ALT result that was not present at baseline.

Subjects had ALT labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant GGT value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant GGT result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had GGT labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant Aldolase value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Aldolase result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had Aldolase labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant Glucose value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Glucose result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had Glucose labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant Potassium value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Potassium result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had Potassium labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant White Blood Cell (WBC) value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant WBC result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had WBC labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant Hemoglobin value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Hemoglobin result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had hemoglobin labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant hematocrit value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant hematocrit result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had hematocrit labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant platelet value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant platelet result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had platelet labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least 1 clinically significant urine leukocyte result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had urine leukocyte labs collected at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant urine protein result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had urine protein labs collected at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant urine glucose result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had urine glucose labs collected at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant urine ketone result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had urine ketone labs collected at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH VitD) result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had 25-OH VitD labs collected at Screening and at the Week 52 visit.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Antinuclear Antibody Test (ANA) result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had ANA labs collected at Screening, Week 12, 24, 40, and 52.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant monoclonal protein value that was not present at baseline. Subjects had monoclonal protein labs collected at Screening, Week 12, 24, 40, and 52.

The average cumulative dosage of prednisone over the one year period of the study was calculated. The results are presented by treatment group.

The Manual Muscle Test (MMT) assesses 26 muscle groups. The muscle strength of each muscle group is graded. The score for each muscle group ranges from 0 (No contraction palpable) to 5 (normal strength). The minimum total MMT score is a 0. The maximum total MMT score is a 130.

The average change in the average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)from Baseline to Week 52 was calculated. The average score is composed of 26 muscle groups that were tested. The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

The Average change in time to rise from a chair comparing Baseline performance to Week 52.The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Average change in time to walk 30 feet comparing Baseline performance to Week 52.The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

The average change in z-score for Dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the femur from the Screening visit to the Week 52 visit was calculated. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening Visit test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Screening visit).

The Screening visit was conducted within 8 weeks of the Baseline visit.

The average change in z-score for Dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the lumbar spine was calculated comparing the results from the Screening visit to Week 52. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening Visit (Week <8)test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- screening Visit). The Screening visit occurred within 8 weeks of the Baseline visit.

Average change in Physician Global Activity Assessment score from Baseline to Week 52. The assessment used a Visual Analog Scale to rate the subject's global (overall) disease activity. A score of 0 cm indicated no evidence of disease activity. A score of 10.0 cm indicated extremely active disease. The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Average change in Patient Global Activity Assessment score from Baseline to Week 52. The assessment used a Visual Analog Scale to rate the subject's perceived global (overall) disease activity. A score of 0 cm indicated no evidence of disease activity. A score of 10.0 cm indicated extremely active disease.

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 12, 24, 32 and 40.

Average change in Cutaneous Disease Activity and Severity Index (CDASI) score from Baseline to Week 52. The assessment graded the severity of the subject's rash. The rash was rated using a a 4-point scale with a score of 0 indicating no rash. The score was added together using all 13 anatomical locations included on the assessment. The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

This is the average change in pruritis score from Baseline to Week 52. The assessment used a Visual Analog Scale to rate the subject's perceived level of pruritis (itchiness). A score of 0 cm indicated "Not itchy at all". A score of 10.0 cm indicated "Extremely itchy".

This assessment was also completed at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)was completed by subjects to assess the affects of their illness on the ability to function in daily life. The HAQ consists of 8 sections. Scoring within each section is from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).The 8 scores of the 8 sections are summed and divided by 8. A higher score indicates more impairment.

The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 12, 24, 32 and 40.

The average change in percent predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from the Screening Visit to Week 52 was calculated. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening Visit results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Screening Visit). The Screening visit occurred within 8 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.

This assessment was also completed at the Week 24 visit.

The average change in percent predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) from Screening to Week 52 was calculated. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening Visit results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Screening visit). The Screening visit occurred within 8 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.

This assessment was also completed during the Week 24 visit.

Average change in percent predicted Diffusion Capacity (DLCO)from the Screening Visit to Week 52 was calculate. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Screening Visit). The Screening visit occurred within 8 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.

This assessment was also completed during the Week 24 visit.

Total of all reporting groups

Subjects will be given syringes containing placebo

Treatment failures were determined based on criteria from the study protocol using objective and subjective ratings from the study physician. If the study physician felt that the rate of prednisone taper needed to be reduced, the prednisone dose needed to be increased or restarted, or a second-line agent added, the patient will be considered to be a treatment failure.

We calculated the average dosage of prednisone from the week 24 visit until the end of the study (week 52).

The Manual Muscle Test (MMT) assesses 26 muscle groups. The muscle strength of each muscle group is graded. The score for each muscle group ranges from 0 (No contraction palpable) to 5 (normal strength). The minimum total MMT score is a 0. The maximum total MMT score is a 130.

The average change in the average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)from Baseline to Week 52 was calculated. The average score is composed of 26 muscle groups that were tested. The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

The reported tolerability measure was defined as the number of participants that completed the entire 52 week study on their originally assigned treatment.

The Average change in time to rise from a chair comparing Baseline performance to Week 52.The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Average change in time to walk 30 feet comparing Baseline performance to Week 52.The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

The average change in z-score for Dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the femur from the Screening visit to the Week 52 visit was calculated. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening Visit test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Screening visit).

The Screening visit was conducted within 8 weeks of the Baseline visit.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

In addition, data may be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The average change in z-score for Dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the lumbar spine was calculated comparing the results from the Screening visit to Week 52. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening Visit (Week <8)test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- screening Visit). The Screening visit occurred within 8 weeks of the Baseline visit.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject left the study early and one subject was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit. In addition, data may be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

Average change in Physician Global Activity Assessment score from Baseline to Week 52. The assessment used a Visual Analog Scale to rate the subject's global (overall) disease activity. A score of 0 cm indicated no evidence of disease activity. A score of 10.0 cm indicated extremely active disease. The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Average change in Patient Global Activity Assessment score from Baseline to Week 52. The assessment used a Visual Analog Scale to rate the subject's perceived global (overall) disease activity. A score of 0 cm indicated no evidence of disease activity. A score of 10.0 cm indicated extremely active disease.

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 12, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Average change in Cutaneous Disease Activity and Severity Index (CDASI) score from Baseline to Week 52. The assessment graded the severity of the subject's rash. The rash was rated using a a 4-point scale with a score of 0 indicating no rash. The score was added together using all 13 anatomical locations included on the assessment. The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

This is the average change in pruritis score from Baseline to Week 52. The assessment used a Visual Analog Scale to rate the subject's perceived level of pruritis (itchiness). A score of 0 cm indicated "Not itchy at all". A score of 10.0 cm indicated "Extremely itchy".

This assessment was also completed at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)was completed by subjects to assess the affects of their illness on the ability to function in daily life. The HAQ consists of 8 sections. Scoring within each section is from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).The 8 scores of the 8 sections are summed and divided by 8. A higher score indicates more impairment.

The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at Week 12, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

The average change in percent predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) from the Screening Visit to Week 52 was calculated. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening Visit results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Screening Visit). The Screening visit occurred within 8 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.

This assessment was also completed at the Week 24 visit.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

In addition, data may be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The average change in percent predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) from Screening to Week 52 was calculated. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening Visit results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Screening visit). The Screening visit occurred within 8 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.

This assessment was also completed during the Week 24 visit.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

In addition, data may be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

Average change in percent predicted Diffusion Capacity (DLCO)from the Screening Visit to Week 52 was calculate. The average change was determined by subtracting the Screening test results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Screening Visit). The Screening visit occurred within 8 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.

This assessment was also completed during the Week 24 visit.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

In addition, data may be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The subject's oral temperature was measured in degrees Celsius. The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4,8,12,16,20,24,32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

In addition, data may be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The subject's respiration rate was measured as number of breaths per minute. The average change was determined by subtracting the Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4,8,12,16,20,24,32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

In addition, data may be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The subject's systolic blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The average value was calculated per treatment group for the Baseline and Week 52 visit based on treatment group. The average change was determined by subtracting the average value Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4,8,12,16,20,24,32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

The subject's diastolic blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). The average value was calculated for the Baseline and Week 52 visit based on treatment group. The average change was determined by subtracting the average value Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4,8,12,16,20,24,32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

The subject's pulse was measured in beats per minute (BPM). The average value was calculated per treatment group for the Baseline and Week 52 visit. The average change was determined by subtracting the average value Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

The subject's body weight was measured in kilograms(kg). The average value was calculated for each treatment group for the Baseline and Week 52 visits. The average change was determined by subtracting the average value at the Baseline Visit (Week 0) results from the Week 52 results (Week 52- Baseline (Week 0)).

This measure was also collected as part of the study protocol at the Screening visit and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32 and 40.

Data for all subjects enrolled in the trial are not available for this assessment. One subject in the placebo group left the study before the Week 52 visit. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant creatine kinase (CK) value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant CK result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had CK labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not. A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant ALT value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant ALT result that was not present at baseline.

Subjects had ALT labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant GGT value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant GGT result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had GGT labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant Aldolase value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Aldolase result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had Aldolase labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant Glucose value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Glucose result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had Glucose labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant Potassium value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Potassium result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had Potassium labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant White Blood Cell (WBC) value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant WBC result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had WBC labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant Hemoglobin value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Hemoglobin result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had hemoglobin labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant hematocrit value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant hematocrit result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had hematocrit labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant platelet value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant platelet result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had platelet labs drawn at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least 1 clinically significant urine leukocyte result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had urine leukocyte labs collected at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant urine protein result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had urine protein labs collected at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant urine glucose result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had urine glucose labs collected at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant urine ketone result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had urine ketone labs collected at Screening, Baseline (Week0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH VitD) result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had 25-OH VitD labs collected at Screening and at the Week 52 visit.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Antinuclear Antibody Test (ANA) result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had ANA labs collected at Screening, Week 12, 24, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.

A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant monoclonal protein value that was not present at baseline. Subjects had monoclonal protein labs collected at Screening, Week 12, 24, 40, and 52.

Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.

Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

The average cumulative dosage of prednisone over the one year period of the study was calculated. The results are presented by treatment group.

The average daily dose of prednisone from baseline to week 52 was calculated by treatment group.

Subjects will be given syringes containing placebo