Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of partner notification by general practice nurses with referral to a specialist clinic for people with genital chlamydia diagnosed in a community setting. We hypothesised that referral to a specialist would be more effective in ensuring treatment of the sexual partners of infected people than the simpler nurse-led strategy.
Partner notification (contact tracing) is essential to the control of sexually transmitted infections. Reports of new chlamydia infections have increased by 66% in the past five years. A National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England, and increasing primary care provision of sexual health care are part of the United Kingdom Government's strategy for tackling increasing rates of sexually transmitted infections. New strategies for managing chlamydia in non-specialist settings are urgently required: genitourinary medicine clinics are failing to cope with their increasing workload; and 45% of cases detected in the chlamydia screening pilot studies were diagnosed in general practice.
Partner notification involves informing the sexual partners of someone with a sexually transmitted infection of the possibility of exposure, offering them diagnosis and treatment, and providing advice about preventing future infection. In the United Kingdom, this is usually done by specialist sexual health advisers in departments of genitourinary medicine. The effectiveness of partner notification in non-specialist settings in developed countries is not known. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of practice nurse-led partner notification with referral to a genitourinary clinic for partner notification conducted by a specialist health adviser, and to compare the resources used by each strategy.
Comparisons: Partner notification at the time of receiving diagnosis and treatment by general practice nurses who received a one-day training course and ongoing support by telephone calls or visits from a specialist adviser in sexual health, compared with referral to a genitourinary medicine clinic for partner notification by a specialist adviser in sexual health.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Practice nurse-led partner notification | Behavioral | |||
| Referral to specialist genitourinary clinic | Behavioral |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of index cases with at least one sexual partner treated | ||
| Number of sexual partners per index case treated |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of sexual partners per index case elicited during sexual history taking | ||
| Positive chlamydia test result six weeks after treatment | ||
| Adherence to advice to abstain from sexual intercourse until both partners completed treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nicola Low, MFPH | Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Project General Practices | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) project general practices | Bristol | Avon | BS8 2PR | United Kingdom | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15459400 | Background | Low N, McCarthy A, Macleod J, Salisbury C, Horner PJ, Roberts TE, Campbell R, Herring A, Skidmore S, Sanford E, Sterne JA, Davey Smith G, Graham A, Huengsberg M, Ross J, Egger M. The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design. Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):342-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.006197. | |
| 16356945 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002690 | Chlamydia Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002694 | Chlamydiaceae Infections |
| D016905 | Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections |
| D001424 | Bacterial Infections |
| D001423 | Bacterial Infections and Mycoses |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) project general practices |
| Birmingham |
| West Midlands |
| B15 2TT |
| United Kingdom |
| Low N, McCarthy A, Roberts TE, Huengsberg M, Sanford E, Sterne JA, Macleod J, Salisbury C, Pye K, Holloway A, Morcom A, Patel R, Robinson SM, Horner P, Barton PM, Egger M. Partner notification of chlamydia infection in primary care: randomised controlled trial and analysis of resource use. BMJ. 2006 Jan 7;332(7532):14-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38678.405370.7C. Epub 2005 Dec 15. |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D015231 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial |
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |