Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIX-HF-5 | Other Identifier | Impulse Dynamics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with the OPTIMIZER System is safe and effective in patients with moderate to severe heart failure symptoms.
IMPULSE Dynamics' FIX HF 5 US Study is a prospective, multi-center, study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals delivered by the implantable OPTIMIZERâ„¢ System in patients with NYHA class III/IV heart failure. The study will involve the recruitment of approximately 420 subjects at a total of up to 50 sites nationwide.
Those subjects who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria based upon baseline test results will be randomized to receive the OPTIMIZERâ„¢ System or to a control group. All subjects randomized will be followed for 1 year and shall receive the same study related assessments throughout the course of the study. In addition, all subjects will continue to receive optimal medical therapy for the treatment of their heart failure.
The primary efficacy assessment consists of a change in exercise tolerance measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and 6 months. Safety variables, such as the rate and cause of hospitalizations or death, shall be collected in both groups and shall be compared at 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimizer System + Optimal medical treatment | Experimental | Optimizer System implanted and cardiac contractility modulation therapy activated. |
|
| Optimal medical treatment | No Intervention | Treatment with optimal medical therapy only. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPTIMIZER System | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy Endpoint: Ventilatory Anerobic Threshold (VAT) | Number of participants with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as quantified by VO2 at ventilatory anerobic threshold (VAT) measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if VAT increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value. | 24 weeks |
| Safety Endpoint: Composite All-cause Mortality and All-cause Hospitalizations | The proportion of patients experiencing a composite event of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations evaluated at 50-weeks | 50-weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Peak VO2 | Number of participants with improvement in peak VO2 measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if peak VO2 increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value. | 24 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Burkhoff, M.D, Ph.D. | Impulse Dynamics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impulse Dynamics | Orangeburg | New York | 10962 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11248765 | Background | Burkhoff D, Shemer I, Felzen B, Shimizu J, Mika Y, Dickstein M, Prutchi D, Darvish N, Ben-Haim SA. Electric currents applied during the refractory period can modulate cardiac contractility in vitro and in vivo. Heart Fail Rev. 2001 Jan;6(1):27-34. doi: 10.1023/a:1009851107189. No abstract available. | |
| 12139295 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Control Group (OMT) | Optimal medical treatment (OMT). Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure, consisting of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and B-blocker. |
| FG001 | Treatment (CCM + OMT) | Treatment group: Subjects receiving OMT and cardiac contractility modulation therapy with the Optimizer System. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Control Group (OMT) | Optimal medical treatment (OMT). Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure, consisting of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and B-blocker. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Efficacy Endpoint: Ventilatory Anerobic Threshold (VAT) | Number of participants with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as quantified by VO2 at ventilatory anerobic threshold (VAT) measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if VAT increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value. | Intention to treat (ITT) population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
50-weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Control Group (OMT) | Optimal medical treatment (OMT). Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure, consisting of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and B-blocker. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Cardiopulmonary Event | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Cardiopulmonary Event | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
The primary endpoint was not validated for use in HF trials (VAT, responder analysis, responder = 20% increase). VAT was missing or indeterminant in 30% of subjects despite use of 2 blinded core labs. ITT analysis required 10 levels of imputation.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angela Stagg, Sr. Director, Clinical and Data Operations | Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc | 8453592389 | angelas@impulse-dynamics.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form | Aug 7, 2014 | Apr 20, 2020 | Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification |
Number of participants with improvement in heart failure symptoms as quantified by a blinded clinician using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification at 24 weeks compared to baseline. The NYHA Class ranges from I - IV, with a lower class indicating a better status. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the NYHA class decreases by ≥ 1 at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline class. |
| 24 weeks |
| Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire | Number of subjects will improvement in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of life. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the MLWHFQ score decreases by ≥10 points at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline score. | 24 weeks |
| Six Minute Hall Walk (6MW) Test | Number of subjects with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the the six minute hall walk (6MW) test. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder with >40-meter increase in distance walked at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline distance. | 24 weeks |
| Ellison K. Nonexcitatory stimulation: 2002: a pace odyssey. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;13(7):696-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00696.x. No abstract available. |
| 12139294 | Background | Marrouche NF, Pavia SV, Zhuang S, Kim YJ, Tabata T, Wallick D, Saad E, Abdul-Karim A, Schweikert R, Saliba W, Tchou P, Natale A. Nonexcitatory stimulus delivery improves left ventricular function in hearts with left bundle branch block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;13(7):691-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00691.x. |
| 11959626 | Background | Mohri S, He KL, Dickstein M, Mika Y, Shimizu J, Shemer I, Yi GH, Wang J, Ben-Haim S, Burkhoff D. Cardiac contractility modulation by electric currents applied during the refractory period. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 May;282(5):H1642-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00959.2001. |
| 12612875 | Background | Morita H, Suzuki G, Haddad W, Mika Y, Tanhehco EJ, Sharov VG, Goldstein S, Ben-Haim S, Sabbah HN. Cardiac contractility modulation with nonexcitatory electric signals improves left ventricular function in dogs with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2003 Feb;9(1):69-75. doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2003.8. |
| 12446280 | Background | Mohri S, Shimizu J, Mika Y, Shemer I, Wang J, Ben-Haim S, Burkhoff D. Electric currents applied during refractory period enhance contractility and systolic calcium in the ferret heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Apr;284(4):H1119-23. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00378.2002. Epub 2002 Nov 21. |
| 11248767 | Background | Sabbah HN, Haddad W, Mika Y, Nass O, Aviv R, Sharov VG, Maltsev V, Felzen B, Undrovinas AI, Goldstein S, Darvish N, Ben-Haim SA. Cardiac contractility modulation with the impulse dynamics signal: studies in dogs with chronic heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2001 Jan;6(1):45-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1009855208097. |
| 12480039 | Background | Pappone C, Rosanio S, Burkhoff D, Mika Y, Vicedomini G, Augello G, Shemer I, Prutchi D, Haddad W, Aviv R, Snir Y, Kronzon I, Alfieri O, Ben-Haim SA. Cardiac contractility modulation by electric currents applied during the refractory period in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1307-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02868-0. |
| 18926146 | Derived | Abraham WT, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K, Carson P, Bourge R, Ellenbogen KA, Parides M, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with systolic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):641-648.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.019. |
| Treatment (OMT + CCM) |
Treatment group: Subjects receiving OMT and cardiac contractility modulation therapy with the Optimizer System. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Peak VO2 | Mean | Standard Deviation | ml/kg/min |
|
| 6 Minute Hall Walk Distance | Mean | Standard Deviation | meters |
|
| NYHA Class III | Class I: Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue dyspnea or fatigue. Class II: Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in dyspnea or fatigue. Class III: Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity results in dyspnea or fatigue. Class IV: Symptoms of heart failure may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| NYHA Class IV | Class I: Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue dyspnea or fatigue. Class II: Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in dyspnea or fatigue. Class III: Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity results in dyspnea or fatigue. Class IV: Symptoms of heart failure may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| MLWHFQ score | Minnessotta Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score. There are 21 questions completed by the participant, with each response on a scale of 0-5. The total score ranges from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of life. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale |
|
| OG001 | Treatment (CCM + OMT) | Treatment group: Subjects receiving OMT and cardiac contractility modulation therapy with the Optimizer System. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Safety Endpoint: Composite All-cause Mortality and All-cause Hospitalizations | The proportion of patients experiencing a composite event of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations evaluated at 50-weeks | Intention-to-treat | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 50-weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Peak VO2 | Number of participants with improvement in peak VO2 measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if peak VO2 increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value. | Completed cases | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification | Number of participants with improvement in heart failure symptoms as quantified by a blinded clinician using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification at 24 weeks compared to baseline. The NYHA Class ranges from I - IV, with a lower class indicating a better status. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the NYHA class decreases by ≥ 1 at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline class. | Completed cases | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire | Number of subjects will improvement in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of life. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the MLWHFQ score decreases by ≥10 points at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline score. | Completed cases | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Six Minute Hall Walk (6MW) Test | Number of subjects with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the the six minute hall walk (6MW) test. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder with >40-meter increase in distance walked at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline distance. | Completed cases | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 weeks |
|
|
|
| 7 |
| 212 |
| 115 |
| 212 |
| 135 |
| 212 |
| EG001 | Treatment (CCM + OMT) | Treatment group: Subjects receiving OMT and cardiac contractility modulation therapy with the Optimizer System. | 13 | 210 | 129 | 210 | 152 | 210 |
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| General Medical | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ICD or Pacemaker System Malfunction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Localized Infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Worsening Heart Failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bleeding | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neurologic Dysfunction | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thromboembolism | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OPTIMIZER lead fracture | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OPTIMIZER RV lead dislodgement | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| IPG problem/change | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OPTIMIZER RA lead dislodgement | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OPTIMIZER pocket dehiscence/erosion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OPTIMIZER pocket infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OPTIMIZER pocket stimulation | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lead perforation | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OPTIMIZER pocket bleeding | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sensation due to CCM | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Extracardiac stimulation | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arrhythmias | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Worsening Heart Failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Localized Infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| General Medical | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided