Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) | NIH |
| National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | NIH |
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate 2 licensed vaccine products (Recombivax and Twinrix) given in a two-dose schedule to youth at risk for hepatitis B and HIV infection to evaluate immunogenicity of the products in this population, barriers to vaccine delivery, and factors which predict a diminished immune response. Since these youths are also potential candidates for future HIV vaccine trials, this study will also include preliminary assessment of youths' understanding of informed consent forms, and willingness to participate in a vaccine trial and return for multiple visits (including blood draws for immunologic assessment).
Hepatitis B (HBV) prophylactic immunization has been recommended for at-risk adolescents for more than 10 years although universal coverage has not been achieved. Vaccine response in healthy adolescents has generally been reported to be excellent. But, data from the study Reaching for Excellence in Adolescent Care and Health (REACH) that studied HIV-negative adolescents who were at-risk of acquiring Hepatitis B infection through sexual or needle sharing behaviors has demonstrated a much lower than expected vaccine response rate in this population using standard vaccine dosing. Some data suggest that factors such as gender or body mass index might be responsible for the differences in response to the vaccine observed in individuals. The reason for the diminished vaccine response in this population is unclear. If in fact, Hepatitis B vaccine response is diminished in this population, then efforts to determine correlates of response and to improve the response are warranted. The proposed trial will evaluate 2 licensed vaccine products given in a two-dose schedule in youth at risk for hepatitis B and HIV infection to evaluate immunogenicity of the products in this population, barriers to vaccine delivery, and factors which predict a diminished immune response.
Since these youths are also potential candidates for future HIV vaccine trials, participation in such trials will require ability to understand and willingness to volunteer for such trials, ability to return for multiple vaccinations and blood draws to assess vaccine response, and willingness to participate in HIV prevention education. A hepatitis B vaccine trial will provide a licensed vaccine to youth in whom the vaccine is indicated and will allow preliminary assessment of youth's willingness to participate in a vaccine trial that involves blood draws for immunologic assessment.
Tools that will be necessary for HIV vaccine trials in youth include a youth-friendly simplified vaccine trial education component with a required written test for the participant, a standardized risk reduction education program, and a computer-assisted assessment of youth behaviors. These tools can be finalized and field tested in youth participating in the hepatitis B vaccine trial without promoting a false sense of protection from HIV. Secondary objectives of this trial will include assessment of a number of ancillary tools crucial for future HIV vaccine trials. This Hepatitis B vaccine trial will also serve as a HIV vaccine preparedness trial for youth at risk for both Hepatitis B and HIV.
Design: This is a phase II, randomized, single-blinded trial of two hepatitis B immunization regimens in 150 HIV-negative, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen and surface antibody negative youth. Vaccinations will be given in a two-dose regimen at 0 and six months (75 subjects in each arm) and the primary outcome will be seroresponsiveness one month after the 6-month dose. Safety and tolerability will also be assessed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active Comparator | Participants receive doses of Recombivax at weeks 0 and 24. A risk-behavior assessment is administered at week 12 and post-vaccination follow-up visits and bloodwork occur at weeks 28 and 76. |
|
| 2 | Experimental | Participants receive doses of Twinrix at weeks 0 and 24. A risk-behavior assessment is administered at week 12 and post-vaccination follow-up visits and bloodwork occur at weeks 28 and 76. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recombivax | Biological | Participants receive doses of Recombivax at weeks 0 and 24. |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative Seroresponsiveness to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen | Seroresponsiveness to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen is defined as follows: Responder: serum antibody level is greater than or equal to 10 mIU/mL. Non-responder: serum antibody level is less than 10 mIU/mL. | Week (Wk) 28 (One month after the second immunization) |
| Safety and Tolerability of Vaccine Regimens of Recombivax and Twinrix (Number of Participants With >=1 Adverse Event (AE)) | Frequency Distribution of AEs by Study Arm and Preferred Term. The safety and tolerability of each vaccine was assessed by measuring reactogenicity. The reactions were coded as "Any" vs. "None". In summarizing the distribution of AEs, the number of subjects with at least one event by preferred term and study arm were reported. | Week 12, Week 24, Week 28, Week 76 |
| Safety and Tolerability of Vaccine Regimens of Recombivax and Twinrix: Serious Adverse Events (SAE)(Number of Subjects With >= 1 SAE) | Frequency Distribution of SAE by Study Arm and Preferred Term. The safety and tolerability of each vaccine was assessed by measuring reactogenicity. The reactions were coded as "Any" vs. "None". The number of participants with at least one SAE is reported. | Week 12, Week 24, Week 28, Week 76 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Vaccine Response | The Log10 titer was used as the quantitative vaccine response. | Week 28 |
| Unadjusted Relationship of Hepatitis B Vaccine Response (Log10 Titer) and Potential Impact Factors Among Subjects Whose Week 28 Antibody Results Are Within Week 28 Visit Window. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Coleen K. Cunningham, MD | Duke University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children's Hospital of Los Angeles | Los Angeles | California | 90027 | United States | ||
| University of California at San Diego |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20173677 | Derived | Cunningham CK, Rudy BJ, Xu J, Bethel J, Kapogiannis BG, Ahmad S, Wilson CM, Flynn PM; Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. Randomized trial to determine safety and immunogenicity of two strategies for hepatitis B vaccination in healthy urban adolescents in the United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Jun;29(6):530-4. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181d285c7. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Intervention | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
The study was started in February 2004 and was completed in July 2008. A total of 11 sites, all in the United States and Puerto Rico, participated in the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Recombivax | Active Comparator: 1st dose at Week 0, 2nd dose at Week 24 |
| FG001 | Twinrix | Experimental: 1st dose at Week 0, 2nd dose at Week 24 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Recombivax | Active Comparator: 1st dose at Week 0, 2nd dose at Week 24 |
| BG001 | Twinrix | Experimental: 1st dose at Week 0, 2nd dose at Week 24 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Qualitative Seroresponsiveness to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen | Seroresponsiveness to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen is defined as follows: Responder: serum antibody level is greater than or equal to 10 mIU/mL. Non-responder: serum antibody level is less than 10 mIU/mL. | Participants were included if they were vaccinated at least once (Intent-to-Treat) | Posted | Number | Participants | Week (Wk) 28 (One month after the second immunization) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Recombivax | Active Comparator: 1st dose at Week 0, 2nd dose at Week 24 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | In Addition to MedDRA 6.0, WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter was used for coding. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Bob Harris | Westat | 301-251-1500 | bobharris@westat.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006509 | Hepatitis B |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D018347 | Hepadnaviridae Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C075655 | Recombivax HB |
| C433226 | twinrix |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Twinrix |
| Biological |
Participants receive doses of Twinrix at weeks 0 and 24. |
|
The Log10 titer at Week 28 was used as the quantitative continuous vaccine response. |
| Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: STUDY ARM. | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Study arm was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: SITE EFFECT | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum antibody level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum a'body level is < 10 mIU/mL. Site effect was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: AGE | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B)Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Age was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: GENDER | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum a'body level is < 10 mIU/mL. Gender was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: HISPANIC ETHNICITY | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Hispanic ethnicity was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: RACE | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Race was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TANNER STAGE FOR FEMALES | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Tanner stage by gender was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TANNER STAGE FOR MALES | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Tanner stage by gender was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: BMI at Baseline | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. BMI at baseline was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: EVER SMOKED CIGARETTES | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Whether participants ever smoked cigarettes was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: SEXUAL IDENTITY | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Sexual identity was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: AGE AT WHICH SUBJECT FIRST HAD SEX (NOT FORCED) | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Age of participants' first unforced sexual encounter was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TOTAL LIFETIME SEX PARTNERS | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Total number of lifetime sex partners was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TOTAL LIFETIME MALE SEX PARTNERS | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Total number of lifetime male sex partners was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TOTAL LIFETIME FEMALE SEX PARTNERS | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Total number of lifetime female sex partners was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: EVER DRANK ALCOHOL | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Whether participants ever drank alcohol was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: EVER SMOKED MARIJUANA | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Whether participants ever smoked marijuana was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: EVER USED DRUGS NOT PRESCRIBE | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Whether participants ever used drugs not prescribed was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Week 28 |
| Immunogenicity to Hep B 18 Months After First Immunization | Persistence of protective antibody response was measured by presence or absence of 10 mIU/ml HepB surface antibody and geometric mean titer of the same antibody at Week 76 | Week 76 |
| Immunogenicity to Hep A in the Twinrix Arm: One Month Post 2nd Vaccination | Hepatitis A antibody response in those subjects in the combined vaccine arm (Twinrix) at 1 month after the 2nd vaccination. Immunogenicity to Hepatitis is given as a positive or negative response. If the Hepatitis A serology was reactive, then the participant was considered to have a positive response; if the Hepatitis A serology was non-reactive, then the participant was considered to have a negative response. | Week 28 |
| Immunogenicity to Hep A in Twinrix Arm: Twelve Months Post 2nd Vaccination | Hepatitis A antibody response in those subjects in the combined vaccine arm (Twinrix) at 12 months after the 2nd vaccination. Immunogenicity to Hepatitis is given as a positive or negative response. | Week 76 |
| Immunogenicity to Hep A in Twinrix Arm: Overall Response (1-month or 12-month After 2nd Vaccination) | Hepatitis A antibody response in those subjects in the combined vaccine arm (Twinrix) at two time points: 1 and 12 months after the 2nd vaccination. Immunogenicity to Hepatitis is given as a positive or negative response. | Week 28 and Week 76 |
| As Treated Analysis - Adequate Antibody Response to Hep B Surface Antigen | The subject was considered seroresponsive to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen if the serum antibody level was greater than or equal to 10 mIU/mL. Those who received only a single vaccination, whose second vaccination was outside of the specified time window, or other cases of protocol violations were excluded from the analysis. | Week 28 |
| Assessment of Youth Understanding of Vaccine Trial and Informed Consent | Assessment of understanding was measured by a questionnaire containing six questions. The summary score is the sum of correct answers from six questions. | Screening |
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92103 |
| United States |
| University of California at San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94118 | United States |
| Children's Hospital National Medical Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
| University of Southern Florida College of Medicine | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Ruth M Rothstein CORE Center/ John H Stroger Jr Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| Tulane Medical Center | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70112 | United States |
| University of Maryland | Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Montefiore Medical Center | The Bronx | New York | 10467 | United States |
| St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital | Memphis | Tennessee | 38105-2794 | United States |
| Unversity of Peurto Rico School of Medicine | San Juan | 00936 | Puerto Rico |
| Moved out of area |
|
| Pregnancy |
|
| Inadvertent enrollment |
|
| vaccinated outside window |
|
| Disallowed medications |
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Age, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quantitative Vaccine Response | The Log10 titer was used as the quantitative vaccine response. | Subjects who had a wk 28 Hep B a'body titer and was no more than 8 wks after the 2nd vaccination were included. 1 subject was missing wk 28 titer. The a'body at week 48 was positive, so subject was treated as a responder for the binary measure. For the continuous a'body titer, the exact number could not be assumed; subject was treated as missing. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Log10 titer (mIU/ml) | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Safety and Tolerability of Vaccine Regimens of Recombivax and Twinrix (Number of Participants With >=1 Adverse Event (AE)) | Frequency Distribution of AEs by Study Arm and Preferred Term. The safety and tolerability of each vaccine was assessed by measuring reactogenicity. The reactions were coded as "Any" vs. "None". In summarizing the distribution of AEs, the number of subjects with at least one event by preferred term and study arm were reported. | The safety and tolerability of each vaccine was assessed and reported among all enrolled participants (per-protocol) after baseline at each visit visit. The data presented are cumulative for events identified at each time point. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 12, Week 24, Week 28, Week 76 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Safety and Tolerability of Vaccine Regimens of Recombivax and Twinrix: Serious Adverse Events (SAE)(Number of Subjects With >= 1 SAE) | Frequency Distribution of SAE by Study Arm and Preferred Term. The safety and tolerability of each vaccine was assessed by measuring reactogenicity. The reactions were coded as "Any" vs. "None". The number of participants with at least one SAE is reported. | The safety and tolerability of each vaccine was assessed and reported among all enrolled participants (per-protocol) after baseline. The data presented are cumulative for events identified at each time point. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 12, Week 24, Week 28, Week 76 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Unadjusted Relationship of Hepatitis B Vaccine Response (Log10 Titer) and Potential Impact Factors Among Subjects Whose Week 28 Antibody Results Are Within Week 28 Visit Window. | The Log10 titer at Week 28 was used as the quantitative continuous vaccine response. | The data for this analysis included those who had a week 28 hepatitis B antibody titer and the week 28 visit window was no more than 8 weeks after the second vaccination (as treated population). | Posted | Number | Participant | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: STUDY ARM. | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Study arm was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: SITE EFFECT | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum antibody level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum a'body level is < 10 mIU/mL. Site effect was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: AGE | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B)Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Age was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: GENDER | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum a'body level is < 10 mIU/mL. Gender was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: HISPANIC ETHNICITY | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Hispanic ethnicity was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: RACE | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Race was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a wk 28 hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TANNER STAGE FOR FEMALES | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Tanner stage by gender was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Females who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer isn't sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TANNER STAGE FOR MALES | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Tanner stage by gender was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Male participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer isn't sufficiently predictive of Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: BMI at Baseline | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. BMI at baseline was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: EVER SMOKED CIGARETTES | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Whether participants ever smoked cigarettes was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: SEXUAL IDENTITY | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Sexual identity was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: AGE AT WHICH SUBJECT FIRST HAD SEX (NOT FORCED) | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Age of participants' first unforced sexual encounter was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TOTAL LIFETIME SEX PARTNERS | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Total number of lifetime sex partners was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TOTAL LIFETIME MALE SEX PARTNERS | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Total number of lifetime male sex partners was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: TOTAL LIFETIME FEMALE SEX PARTNERS | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Total number of lifetime female sex partners was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: EVER DRANK ALCOHOL | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Whether participants ever drank alcohol was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: EVER SMOKED MARIJUANA | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Whether participants ever smoked marijuana was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measure: Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (Binary); Predictor: EVER USED DRUGS NOT PRESCRIBE | Qualitative Vaccine Response to Hepatitis B (Hep B) Surface Antigen is defined as a "Responder" if serum a'body level is >= 10 mIU/mL and a "Non- Responder" if a serum antibody level is < 10 mIU/mL. Whether participants ever used drugs not prescribed was analyzed as a potential impact factor and was measured and examined for the association with both the presence of adequate response as well as the quantitative titer one month post 2 vaccine doses. | Participants who had a Wk 28 Hep B a'body titer were included. One subject had no results at Wk 28 but had results at entry and end of study (EOS). Since the EOS titer was > 10, this subject was included as a responder in qualitative analyses, but not in quantitative analyses, since the EOS titer is not sufficiently predictive of the Wk 28 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Immunogenicity to Hep B 18 Months After First Immunization | Persistence of protective antibody response was measured by presence or absence of 10 mIU/ml HepB surface antibody and geometric mean titer of the same antibody at Week 76 | Participants who had a week 76 Hepatitis B antibody titer were included in this analysis. One subject had an a'body titer at EOS visit but did not have a'body data at week 76. Since the EOS was close to week 76, the titer from EOS was recoded as the week 76 titer. | Posted | Number | Participants | Week 76 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Immunogenicity to Hep A in the Twinrix Arm: One Month Post 2nd Vaccination | Hepatitis A antibody response in those subjects in the combined vaccine arm (Twinrix) at 1 month after the 2nd vaccination. Immunogenicity to Hepatitis is given as a positive or negative response. If the Hepatitis A serology was reactive, then the participant was considered to have a positive response; if the Hepatitis A serology was non-reactive, then the participant was considered to have a negative response. | The data for this analysis included those in the Twinrix arm who had week 28 hepatitis A serology results. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Immunogenicity to Hep A in Twinrix Arm: Twelve Months Post 2nd Vaccination | Hepatitis A antibody response in those subjects in the combined vaccine arm (Twinrix) at 12 months after the 2nd vaccination. Immunogenicity to Hepatitis is given as a positive or negative response. | Subjects in the Twinrix arm who had a Week 76 hepatitis A serology results were included in this analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 76 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Immunogenicity to Hep A in Twinrix Arm: Overall Response (1-month or 12-month After 2nd Vaccination) | Hepatitis A antibody response in those subjects in the combined vaccine arm (Twinrix) at two time points: 1 and 12 months after the 2nd vaccination. Immunogenicity to Hepatitis is given as a positive or negative response. | Subjects in the Twinrix arm who had week 28 &/or wk 76 HepA serology results were included. For overall response analysis, if a subject was reactive at either wk 28 or wk 76, then the overall response for subject was considered "Positive". If subject was non-reactive at both wk 28and wk 76, then the overall response for subject was "Negative". | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 28 and Week 76 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | As Treated Analysis - Adequate Antibody Response to Hep B Surface Antigen | The subject was considered seroresponsive to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen if the serum antibody level was greater than or equal to 10 mIU/mL. Those who received only a single vaccination, whose second vaccination was outside of the specified time window, or other cases of protocol violations were excluded from the analysis. | Subjects who completed both vaccinations according to the protocol were included in the analysis (as treated analysis). Those who only had 1 vaccination,whose 2nd vaccination was outside the specified time window, or other cases of protocol violations, were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assessment of Youth Understanding of Vaccine Trial and Informed Consent | Assessment of understanding was measured by a questionnaire containing six questions. The summary score is the sum of correct answers from six questions. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of correct answers | Screening |
|
|
|
| 2 |
| 60 |
| 6 |
| 60 |
| EG001 | Twinrix | Experimental: 1st dose at Week 0, 2nd dose at Week 24 | 2 | 63 | 4 | 63 |
|
| Forearm Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter |
|
| Road Traffic Accident | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
|
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Chest Pain | General disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Pain NOS | General disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Dengue Fever | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection NOS | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Femure Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 6 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Foot Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Forearm Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Appetite Decreased N OS | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Panic Attack | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Appendectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
| Internal Fixation of Fracture | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 6.0 | Systematic Assessment | WHODD 2003, 2nd quarter also used for coding |
|
The Adolescent Medicine Trials Network (ATN) for HIV/AIDS Interventions Publication Policy outlines procedures for the development and review of abstracts, publications and presentations. The Adolescent Medicine Leadership Group (AMLG) retains custody of and primary rights to the data. Use of data must be approved by the protocol team and AMLG.
| D004266 |
| DNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D006525 | Hepatitis, Viral, Human |
| D006505 | Hepatitis |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Two-sided confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both the "Recombivax" and "Twinrix" arms. The CI for the "Recombivax" arm is presented here. |
| 95% confidence interval |
| Mean response |
| 2.29 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 2.05 |
| 2.53 |
| Superiority or Other |
| Two-sided confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both the "Recombivax" and "Twinrix" arms. The CI for the "Twinrix" arm is presented here. | 95% confidence interval | Response rate | 2.58 | 2-Sided | 95 | 2.40 | 2.76 | Superiority or Other |
| Road traffic accident |
|
| Anxiety |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Site Effect: Baltimore |
|
| Age: 15 - 17 years |
|
| Age: 12 - 14 years |
|
| Gender: Female |
|
| Gender: Male |
|
| Hispanic Ethnicity: No |
|
| Hispanic Ethnicity: Yes |
|
| Racial Background: White |
|
| Racial Background: Other/Mixed Race |
|
| Racial Background: Black/African American |
|
| Tanner Stage for Females: Stage 5 |
|
| Tanner Stage for Females: Stages 1 - 4 |
|
| Tanner Stage for Males: Stage 5 |
|
| Tanner Stage for Males: Stages 1 - 4 |
|
| BMI at Baseline: Normal and Underweight (<25.0) |
|
| BMI at Baseline: Overweight and Obese (>=25.0) |
|
| Ever Smoked Cigarettes: No |
|
| Ever Smoked Cigarettes: Yes |
|
| Sexual Identity: Straight (Heterosexual) |
|
| Sexual Identity: Gay, Bi, Not Sure or Undecided |
|
| Age First Sex Not Forced: Never |
|
| Age First Sex Not Forced: <=14 Years |
|
| Age First Sex Not Forced: 15-17 Years |
|
| Total Lifetime Sex Partners: 0 Partners |
|
| Total Lifetime Sex Partners: 1-5 Partners |
|
| Total Lifetime Sex Partners: >= 6 Partners |
|
| Total Lifetime Male Sex Partners: 0 Partners |
|
| Total Lifetime Male Sex Partners: 1-5 Partners |
|
| Total Lifetime Male Sex Partners: >= 6 Partners |
|
| Total Lifetime Female Sex Partners: 0 Partners |
|
| Total Lifetime Female Sex Partners: 1-5 Partners |
|
| Total Lifetime Female Sex Partners: >= 6 Partners |
|
| Ever Drank Alcohol: No |
|
| Ever Drank Alcohol: Yes |
|
| Ever Smoked Marijuana: No |
|
| Ever Smoked Marijuana: Yes |
|
| Ever Used Drugs not Prescribed: No |
|
| Ever Used Drugs not Prescribed: Yes |
|
This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of site effect(Other sites vs. Baltimore) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups.
| Regression, Linear |
| 0.9890 |
| Regression coefficent |
| -0.0025 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 0.1792 |
| 95 |
| Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of age(15 - 17 year old particpants vs. 12 - 14 year old participants) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.2796 | Regression coeffcient | 0.2053 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.1885 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of gender(Females vs. Males) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.0080 | Regresssion coeffcient | -0.4726 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.1734 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of Hispanic ethnicity (Not Hispanic vs. Hispanic) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.2543 | Regression coefficient | 0.2189 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.1905 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of racial background(White vs. Other/Mixed vs. Black/African American) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between White vs. Other/Mixed Race is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.3661 | Regression coefficient | 0.2994 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.3292 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of racial background(White vs. Other/Mixed vs. Black/African American) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between White vs. Black/African American is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.9812 | Regression coefficient | 0.0083 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.3497 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of Tanner Stage for Females(Stage 5 vs. Stages 1 - 4) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.7766 | Regression coefficient | -0.0663 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2314 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of Tanner Stage for Males(Stage 5 vs. Stages 1 - 4) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.2492 | Regression coefficient | -0.2929 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2508 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of BMI at Baseline(Normal and Underweight (<25.0) vs. Overweight and Obsese (>= 25.0)) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.0877 | Regression coeffcient | -0.3160 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.1826 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of BMI at Baseline(continuous variable) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. | Regression, Linear | 0.0117 | Regression coefficient | -0.0292 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.0113 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of smokng cigarettes(Never Smoked vs. Has Smoked) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.7899 | Regression coefficient | -0.0578 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2163 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of sexual identity(Straight (heterosexual) vs. Gay (homosexual), Bi (bisexual), and Not Sure or Undecided) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.0607 | Regression coefficient | -0.5339 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2803 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of age at which the subject first had unforced sex (Never vs. <= 14 year olds vs. 15-17 year olds) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between "never" vs. "<= 14 year olds" is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.1670 | Regression coefficient | -0.3883 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2779 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of age at which subject had first unforced sex (Never vs. <= 14 year olds vs. 15 - 17 year olds) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between "never" vs. "15-17 year olds" is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.8682 | Regression coefficient | 0.0344 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2065 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of total number of lifetime sex partners (0 partners vs. 1-5 partners vs. >= 6 partners) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between 0 partners vs. 1-5 partners is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.4219 | Regression coefficient | 0.1532 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.1896 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of Total Number of Lifetime Sex Partners(0 partners vs. 1-5 partners vs. >= 6 partners) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between 0 partners vs. >= 6 partners is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.0020 | Regression coefficient | -0.7752 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2420 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of Total Number of Male Lifetime Sex Partners(0 partners vs. 1-5 partners vs. >= 6 partners) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between 0 partners vs. 1-5 partners is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.1659 | Regression coefficient | 0.2921 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2086 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of Total Number of Male Lifetime Sex Partners(0 partners vs. 1-5 partners vs. >= 6 partners) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between 0 partners vs. >= 6 partners is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.0000 | Regression coefficient | -1.6163 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2839 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of Total Number of Female Lifetime Sex Partners(0 partners vs. 1-5 partners vs. >= 6 partners) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between 0 partners vs. 1-5 partners is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.4701 | Regression coefficient | -0.1788 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2463 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of Total Number of Female Lifetime Sex Partners(0 partners vs. 1-5 partners vs. >= 6 partners) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. In this statistical analysis, information for the comparison between 0 partners vs. >= 6 partners is presented. | Regression, Linear | 0.7572 | Regression coefficient | 0.1083 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.3488 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of whether a subject ever drank alcohol (No vs. Yes) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.8657 | Regression coefficient | -0.0307 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.1809 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of whether a subject ever smoked marijuana(No vs. Yes) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.0917 | Regression coefficient | -0.3548 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.2076 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| This is a regression analysis for testing the effect of whether a subject ever used drugs not prescribed(No vs. Yes) on vaccine response as measured in log10 titers. The null hypothesis is no difference between groups. | Regression, Linear | 0.3788 | Regression coefficient | -0.3474 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.3924 | 95 | Superiority or Other |
| 0.0118 |
Since Hispanic (no, yes) was a factor with a p-value of < 0.15 in the unadjusted univariate regression analysis, it was entered into the initial full multivariate model. |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 7.38 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 1.56 |
| 34.95 |
The reference group is the "Hispanic: NO" group. |
| Superiority or Other |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 0.2685 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 4.12 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.34 |
| 50.76 |
The reference group is the 'White' group. |
| Superiority or Other |
| 0.0222 |
Since sexual identity was a factor with a p-value of < 0.15 in the unadjusted univariate regression analysis, it was entered into the initial full multivariate model. |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 0.12 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.02 |
| 0.74 |
The reference group is the "Straight (heterosexual)" group. |
| Superiority or Other |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 0.0190 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 0.12 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.02 |
| 0.70 |
The reference group is the "Never" (had sex) group. |
| Superiority or Other |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 0.6893 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 1.65 |
| 95 |
The reference group is the "0 partners" group. Two sided 95% confidence interval: Lower Limit = 0.17; upper limit = infinity |
| Superiority or Other |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 1.0000 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 1.18 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.00 |
| 10.01 |
The reference group is the "0 Partners" group |
| Superiority or Other |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 0.8904 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 1.17 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.13 |
| 10.46 |
The reference group is the "0 Partners" group. |
| Superiority or Other |
| 81.08 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 68.84 |
| 92.04 |
Response rate=Total number subjects responded/Total number subjects in arm |
| Superiority or Other |
| Responding Rate | 88.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | 75.69 | 95.47 | Response rate=Total number subjects responded/Total number subjects in arm | Superiority or Other |
| 85.37 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 70.83 |
| 94.43 |
| Superiority or Other |
| 95% confidence interval | Responding Rate % | 93.62 | 2-Sided | 95 | 82.46 | 98.66 | Superiority or Other |