Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the clinical efficacy of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) guided 1 Hz repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) applied to the Supplementary Motor Area (SMA) in OCD patients who have not fully responded to conventional therapies. The investigators will collect TMS measures of motor cortex excitability to test whether rTMS restores normal levels of intracortical inhibition found to be deficient in OCD. The investigators hypothesize that:
This study tests the efficacy of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) guided repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). This study also examines measures of brain function that may inform us about the brain basis underlying OCD.
Despite major advances in the study and treatment of OCD, patients often do not respond or experience only partial remission from pharmacotherapy or cognitive behavioral therapy. rTMS is a non-invasive procedure that allows stimulation of the brain using magnetic fields. Some studies have reported that rTMS may be helpful in reducing obsessive and compulsive symptoms. While promising, prior research has several limitations (e.g., relatively small sample sizes, stimulation of sub-optimal target areas, relatively short durations of treatment, and lack of sham (placebo) comparison).
This study addresses the drawbacks of prior work, and will provide data that will be important in determining whether rTMS can be useful for OCD patients resistant to conventional therapies. In this trial, 32 adult outpatients with OCD, that have been only partially responsive to conventional therapies, will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (active low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS or sham-placebo) applied to the Supplementary Motor Area (SMA) daily for up to four weeks. If rTMS will be added onto ongoing pharmacotherapy, the doses must have been stable for 3 months prior to study entry. The SMA was selected because of its connections with areas of the brain, especially motor areas, implicated in OCD. Pilot work indicates that stimulation of SMA with low frequency rTMS was beneficial in OCD patients. Low frequency rTMS has the added benefit of a better safety profile (i.e. no risk of seizure) compared to high frequency rTMS.
Rating scales for symptom change will be obtained at baseline, during the rTMS course, and at the end of 4 weeks of treatment. Patients who do not meet response criteria after four weeks of sham and partial responders to either active or sham will be offered an open-label, cross-over phase for an additional four weeks of daily active rTMS treatment. Patients who meet response criteria in either the randomized phase or the cross-over phase will continue routine clinical care under the supervision of their treating psychiatrist, and will be invited back for a repeat assessment at 3 and 6 months to determine the persistence of benefit.
Measures of the excitability of the motor cortex have been reported to be abnormal in OCD, and may relate to dysfunction in motor pathways related to OCD circuits. We will collect measures of motor cortex excitability (performed with single pulse TMS) at baseline and after treatment to determine whether changes in these measures may be correlated with clinical improvement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active rTMS | Active Comparator | Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) |
|
| Sham rTMS | Sham Comparator | Placebo Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) | Device | Stimulus train of 30 min duration, 1Hz frequency, and 110% of the motor threshold intensity given once a day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks by Magstim SuperRapid Magnetic Stimulator. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Improvement (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale/Y-BOCS) | Response rate was defined as a decrease >25% on the YBOCS-SR. Y-BOCS-Self Report (Baer et al. 1993) is very similar to the clinician-administered one, and has shown excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, performing somewhat better than the interview (Steketee et al., 1996); subjects are asked to focus on the main obsessions and main compulsions and to answer five questions: time spent, interference, distress, resistance, and control. Consistent with the interview format, subjects rate each item on a 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) scale. | Through study completion |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Cortex Excitability (Motor Threshold) | In 22 OCD patients, who completed the RCT, we applied the new customized software for acquisition and analysis of neurophysiology data that was developed to allow for automatic control of the TMS devices during motor cortex excitability measures. Specifically, the software delivers TMS pulses and automatically determines motor threshold (MT); a descending staircase method is utilized, starting at the intensity at which the optimal site selection for the MT is determined. After each stimulus in the MT experiments, the software would prompt the user to confirm the automated MEP-detection. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Other exclusion criteria include those common to every TMS protocol:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Antonio Mantovani, MD, PhD | Columbia University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York State Psychiatric Institute, Experimental Therapeutics | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12830365 | Background | Maeda F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Aug;168(4):359-76. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1216-x. Epub 2003 Jun 26. | |
| 12057034 | Background | Burt T, Lisanby SH, Sackeim HA. Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002 Mar;5(1):73-103. doi: 10.1017/S1461145702002791. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active rTMS | Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): Stimulus train of 30 min duration, 1Hz frequency, and 110% of the motor threshold intensity given once a day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks by Magstim SuperRapid Magnetic Stimulator. |
| FG001 | Sham rTMS | Placebo Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Sham: Sham rTMS will be administered using the Magstim Sham coil which contains a mu-metal shield that diverts the majority of the magnetic flux such that a minimal (less than 3%) magnetic field is delivered to the cortex in order to provoke a subjective sensation similar to that obtained with the real stimulation but without inducing significant cortical stimulation. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
A total of 22 patients with at least 1 follow up were included in the final analyses. Four subjects only had baseline measure. The reason for them to withdraw from the study was their inability to attend daily treatment sessions due to schedule conflict with their job and long commute to the TMS laboratory.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active rTMS | Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): Stimulus train of 30 min duration, 1Hz frequency, and 110% of the motor threshold intensity given once a day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks by Magstim SuperRapid Magnetic Stimulator. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Clinical Improvement (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale/Y-BOCS) | Response rate was defined as a decrease >25% on the YBOCS-SR. Y-BOCS-Self Report (Baer et al. 1993) is very similar to the clinician-administered one, and has shown excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, performing somewhat better than the interview (Steketee et al., 1996); subjects are asked to focus on the main obsessions and main compulsions and to answer five questions: time spent, interference, distress, resistance, and control. Consistent with the interview format, subjects rate each item on a 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) scale. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Through study completion |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active rTMS | Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): Stimulus train of 30 min duration, 1Hz frequency, and 110% of the motor threshold intensity given once a day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks by Magstim SuperRapid Magnetic Stimulator. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Antonio Mantovani | CUNY | 212-650-5417 | amantovani@med.cuny.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009771 | Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sham | Device | Sham rTMS will be administered using the Magstim Sham coil which contains a mu-metal shield that diverts the majority of the magnetic flux such that a minimal (less than 3%) magnetic field is delivered to the cortex in order to provoke a subjective sensation similar to that obtained with the real stimulation but without inducing significant cortical stimulation. |
|
| Through study completion |
| Motor Cortex Excitability (Short Intracortical Inhibition) | In 22 OCD patients enrolled in the RCT, we applied the new customized software for acquisition and analysis of neurophysiology data that was developed to allow for automatic control of the TMS devices during motor cortex excitability measures. For the paired-pulse (PP) measurements of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) the interstimulus interval (ISI) was set to 8-12 seconds on a continuous uniform distribution. The FPGA board samples the EMG data, controls the timing of the TMS stimuli, and also controls the intensity of the devices. | Through study completion |
| 15607295 | Background | Rossi S, Bartalini S, Ulivelli M, Mantovani A, Di Muro A, Goracci A, Castrogiovanni P, Battistini N, Passero S. Hypofunctioning of sensory gating mechanisms in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan 1;57(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.09.023. |
| 19691873 | Background | Mantovani A, Simpson HB, Fallon BA, Rossi S, Lisanby SH. Randomized sham-controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 Mar;13(2):217-27. doi: 10.1017/S1461145709990435. Epub 2009 Aug 20. |
| 19793582 | Background | Mantovani A, Westin G, Hirsch J, Lisanby SH. Functional magnetic resonance imaging guided transcranial magnetic stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Apr 1;67(7):e39-40. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.009. Epub 2009 Sep 30. No abstract available. |
| 15982444 | Background | Mantovani A, Lisanby SH, Pieraccini F, Ulivelli M, Castrogiovanni P, Rossi S. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette's syndrome (TS). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;9(1):95-100. doi: 10.1017/S1461145705005729. Epub 2005 Jun 28. |
| Sham rTMS |
Placebo Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Sham: Sham rTMS will be administered using the Magstim Sham coil which contains a mu-metal shield that diverts the majority of the magnetic flux such that a minimal (less than 3%) magnetic field is delivered to the cortex in order to provoke a subjective sensation similar to that obtained with the real stimulation but without inducing significant cortical stimulation. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Gender | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | Sham rTMS | Placebo Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Sham: Sham rTMS will be administered using the Magstim Sham coil which contains a mu-metal shield that diverts the majority of the magnetic flux such that a minimal (less than 3%) magnetic field is delivered to the cortex in order to provoke a subjective sensation similar to that obtained with the real stimulation but without inducing significant cortical stimulation. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Motor Cortex Excitability (Motor Threshold) | In 22 OCD patients, who completed the RCT, we applied the new customized software for acquisition and analysis of neurophysiology data that was developed to allow for automatic control of the TMS devices during motor cortex excitability measures. Specifically, the software delivers TMS pulses and automatically determines motor threshold (MT); a descending staircase method is utilized, starting at the intensity at which the optimal site selection for the MT is determined. After each stimulus in the MT experiments, the software would prompt the user to confirm the automated MEP-detection. | repeated measure ANOVA, time X group interaction, right hemisphere MT | Posted | Mean | Full Range | % MT change on right hemisphere | Through study completion |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Motor Cortex Excitability (Short Intracortical Inhibition) | In 22 OCD patients enrolled in the RCT, we applied the new customized software for acquisition and analysis of neurophysiology data that was developed to allow for automatic control of the TMS devices during motor cortex excitability measures. For the paired-pulse (PP) measurements of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) the interstimulus interval (ISI) was set to 8-12 seconds on a continuous uniform distribution. The FPGA board samples the EMG data, controls the timing of the TMS stimuli, and also controls the intensity of the devices. | Independent sample t-test, right hemisphere SICI | Posted | Mean | Full Range | % change in conditioned/control MEP | Through study completion |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 11 |
| 0 |
| 11 |
| EG001 | Sham rTMS | Placebo Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Sham: Sham rTMS will be administered using the Magstim Sham coil which contains a mu-metal shield that diverts the majority of the magnetic flux such that a minimal (less than 3%) magnetic field is delivered to the cortex in order to provoke a subjective sensation similar to that obtained with the real stimulation but without inducing significant cortical stimulation. | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided