Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of LAMICTAL (lamotrigine) extended-release with placebo in the treatment of Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) seizures. LAMICTAL extended-release is an investigational drug. Placebo tablets look like LAMICTAL extended-release tablets but do not contain active medication. In this study, LAMICTAL extended-release or placebo tablets will be added to current seizure treatments.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator |
| |
| lamotrigine (LAMICTAL) extended-relesase | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lamotrigine (LAMICTAL) extended-release | Drug | Primary experimental dosage form |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic (PGTC) Seizure Frequency During the Entire Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19) compared to the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 up to Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency. PGTC seizures are more commonly known as gran mal seizures. | Baseline through end of Double-Blind Treatment Phase (up to Week 19) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, or 100% Reduction in PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Entire Double-Blind (DB)Treatment Phase (TP), the Escalation Phase, the Maintenance Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase | Change in seizure frequency was calculated as the average seizure frequency during each of the following: the Entire DB Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19); the Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7); the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19); and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19), minus the seizure frequency at Baseline. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Is ≥13 years of age (male or female).
Has a confident diagnosis of epilepsy with PGTC seizures for more than 24 weeks prior to the Baseline Phase.
Has electroencephalogram (EEG) evidence of either spike-and-wave discharges consistent with PGTC, or at least 2 EEGs with no indication of focal abnormalities. The EEG may be historical or prospective. Investigators may use a historical EEG as long as there is appropriate documentation.
Has a documented history of PGTC seizures with or without other generalized seizure type(s) with no focal onset, and at least 1 PGTC seizure during the eight consecutive weeks (i.e., 56 consecutive days) prior to starting the 8-week Baseline Phase.
Has at least 3 PGTC seizures occurring anytime during an 8-week (i.e., 56 days) prospective Baseline Phase.
NOTE: When a historical baseline is used, the same time period cannot count for documentation of inclusion criteria 4 and 5. Additionally, innumerable seizure activity will not count towards the number of seizures required for randomization.
NOTE: With authorization from GSK, a maximum of four weeks (i.e., 28 days) of historical seizure data may replace up to four weeks (i.e., 28 days) of the prospective Baseline Phase for subjects providing reliable documentation of the following:
All subjects permitted to use historical seizure data must complete a minimum of four weeks (i.e., 28 days) of the prospective Baseline Phase. The historical Baseline Phase and the prospective Baseline Phase must equal 56 consecutive days.
Is currently treated with a stable regimen of one or two AED(s) for at least four weeks prior to starting the Baseline Phase (historical or prospective).
NOTE: Benzodiazepines used chronically will be considered to be concurrent AEDs.
NOTE: Subjects with surgically implanted vagal nerve stimulators (VNS) will be allowed to enter the study provided that all of the following conditions are met:
Is able and willing to maintain an accurate and complete daily written seizure diary, or has a parent/caregiver who is able and willing to maintain an accurate and complete daily written seizure diary for the entire duration of the study.
Is able to comply with dosing of study drugs, background AEDs and all study procedures.
Has given written informed consent, or has a parent/legally authorized representative who has given written informed consent, prior to the performance of any study assessments.
If female, and of childbearing potential, must be using an acceptable form of birth control, to include one of the following:
Complete abstinence from intercourse for two weeks before exposure to the study drug, throughout the clinical trial, and for a period after the trial to account for elimination of the drug (a minimum of 3 weeks).
Consistent and correct use of one of the following methods of birth control:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Anniston | Alabama | 36207 | United States | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20937567 | Derived | Biton V, Di Memmo J, Shukla R, Lee YY, Poverennova I, Demchenko V, Saiers J, Adams B, Hammer A, Vuong A, Messenheimer J. Adjunctive lamotrigine XR for primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Nov;19(3):352-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.07.022. Epub 2010 Oct 30. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research. | View source |
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAM100036 | Informed Consent Form | View IPD |
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The number of par. starting the CP does not equal the number completing the TP, as 1) the CP was optional, 2) not everyone from the TP was eligible to enter the CP, and 3) Baseline Failures were allowed to enter the CP, however they were not included in the "started" count for the TP.
All participants (par.) that complete the Treatment Phase (TP) and all Baseline Failures (par. who did not meet randomization seizure criteria necessary to qualify for the TP) are eligible to enter the Continuation Phase (CP). The CP is for long-term safety exposure to lamotrigine (LTG) extended release (XR); it is not a cross-over phase.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Double-Blind Phase: Placebo | Control - matching placebo once daily |
| FG001 | Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR | Lamotrigine (LTG) extended release (XR) once daily |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Phase |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo control |
|
| Entire DB Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19), Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19) |
| Percent Change From Baseline in PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Escalation Phase, the Maintenance Phase, and During the Last 8 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and during the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19) compared to the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 up to Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency. | Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Week 12 up to Week 19) |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to >=50% Reduction in Seizure Frequency in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | 50% reduction in seizure frequency is defined as the time at which a participant first achieved and maintained a >=50% reduction in seizure frequency following exposure to at least 1 week of study drug. | Baseline through end of Double-Blind Treatment Phase (up to Week 19) |
| Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Change from baseline in body weight is calculated as the Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) value minus the Baseline value. | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Status on the Investigator's Global Assessment in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The investigators rated the participants' overall clinical status based on 7 clinical factors and an overall factor: seizure frequency, duration, and intensity; adverse experiences; social, intellectual, and motor functioning. Using a 7-point scale (marked deterioration [1], moderate deterioration [2], mild deterioration [3], no change [4], mild improvement [5], moderate improvement [6], or marked improvement [7]), the investigators assessed the participants' status compared to their condition prior to initiating study medication. | Week 19 (or last on-study assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Number of Participants With Improved Satisfaction With Seizure Control on the Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with their seizure control compared to their seizure control prior to initiating study drug on a 7 point scale: marked deterioration (1), moderate deterioration (2), mild deterioration (3), no change (4), mild improvement (5), moderate improvement (6), or marked improvement (7). | Week 19 (or last on-study assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Entire Continuation Phase (CP), the Transition Phase, the Open-Label Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the Open-Label Phase | Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) minus the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 through Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency. | Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) |
| Number of Participants With >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, or 100% Reduction or >=50% Increase From Baseline in Weekly PGTC Seizure Frequency for the Entire Continuation Phase, the Transition Phase, the Open-Label (OL) Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the OL Phase. | Change in seizure frequency was calculated as the average seizure frequency during each of the following: the Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52); the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7); the Open-Label (OL) Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52); and the last 8 weeks of the Open Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) minus the seizure frequency at Baseline. W, Week. | Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood State (POMS) Mood Disturbance Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The POMS is a self-administered 65-item questionnaire that evaluates the participants' perception of their mood state in 6 areas: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), with higher scores indicating a more negative mood state. A total score (from 0 to 24) is obtained by summing the scores of the six domains. | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The 20-item CES-D questionnaire is self-administered and asks respondents to report the frequency to which the 20 events were experienced over the past week. A 4-point Likert scale is used and ranges from rarely or none of the time (0) to most or all of the time (3). The total score, a sum across the 20 items (ranging from 0 to 60), determines the extent to which a participant may be experiencing depression. Higher scores indicate a higher severity of depression. | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy (NDDI-E) 6-Item Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The NDDI-E is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 46 brief phrases/words to identify mood disorders across the spectrum of depression. It was developed to capture depressive moods that are co-morbid with the disease of epilepsy or its treatment as well as to measure the depressive state of the participant. All phrases are measured on a 4-point Likert scale of Never (1) to Always/often (4) and refer to the participants' mood over the past week. Scoring is comprised of a total mood score calculated by summing the scores of 6 specific items (from 6=never to 24=always or often). | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31-P (QOLIE-31P) Overall Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire that evaluates the participants' perception of his or her quality of life in 7 domains: seizure worry, emotional well being, energy/fatigue, cognitive functioning, medication effects, social functioning, and overall quality of life. Each domain (with scores ranging from 0 to 100) is summed and divided by the total number of questions that were answered. The overall score is derived by weighting and then summing up the seven domain scores. | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Adverse Experience Profile (AEP) Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The AEP is a list of 19 items covering many possible side effects attributable to drug treatment. The participants respond by assessing how much each event has been a problem for them over the past 4 weeks (1=Never a Problem to 4=Always a Problem). Each individual item can be examined; an overall adverse events score is calculated as the sum of the scores across the 19 items. The AEP total score ranges from 19 to 76, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of adverse event severity. | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Seizure Severity Questionnaire (SSQ) Global Bother Score at Week 19 Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The SSQ is a self-reported instrument developed to assess the severity of seizures and seizure symptoms. The scale consists of 10 major clinical features/symptoms of seizures that the participants rate on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from very mild/helpful/no bother at all [1] to very severe/no help/bothersome [7]). The Global Bother Domain is the primary score used for the analysis of the SSQ and has scores ranging from 1 to 7. | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) 8-Item Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The ESS is an 8-item, self-administered questionnaire that measures excessive daytime sleepiness in adults. The instrument captures information on the extent to which the participant would be likely, or not, to fall asleep in certain situations. The stimulus question is: How likely are you to doze off or fall asleep in the following situations, in contrast to feeling just tired? Questions are answered on a 4-point scale (would never doze [0] to high chance of dozing [3]). The total score ranges from 0 to 24, where a higher score indicates a higher chance of dozing. | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Serum Concentrations and Population (POP) Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Lamotrigine | Serum samples for participants on lamotrigine were analyzed with a validated analytical method based on solid phase extraction of serum followed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Mass Spectrometry (MS)/MS analysis. The lower limit of quantification (LLQ) for serum lamotrigine was 4 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL), using a 50 microliter (µL) aliquot of human serum with a higher limit of quantification (HLQ) of 4,000 ng/mL. PK data cannot be reported, as PK data from several different studies have been combined into one POP/PK analysis and cannot be separated by study. | Blood samples drawn at Treatment Weeks 11, 15, and 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| Birmingham |
| Alabama |
| 35294-0021 |
| United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Northport | Alabama | 35476 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tuscaloosa | Alabama | 35406 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85006 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85013 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85259 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona | 85712 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Little Rock | Arkansas | 72205 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Los Angeles | California | 90073 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Newport Beach | California | 92660 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sepuldeva | California | 91343 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20037 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hollywood | Florida | 33021 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Maitland | Florida | 32751 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ocala | Florida | 34471 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Augusta | Georgia | 30912-3200 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Marietta | Georgia | 30060 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Savannah | Georgia | 31405 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Suwanee | Georgia | 30024 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Flossmoor | Illinois | 60422 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Springfield | Illinois | 62702 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Des Moines | Iowa | 50309-1426 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wichita | Kansas | 67214 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Crestview Hills | Kentucky | 41017 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lafayette | Louisiana | 70503 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Boston | Massachusetts | 02118 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49525 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Traverse City | Michigan | 49684 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55422 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chesterfield | Missouri | 63017 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89106 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Edison | New Jersey | 08818 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | West Orange | New Jersey | 07052 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Amherst | New York | 14226 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Asheville | North Carolina | 28801 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Greenville | North Carolina | 27834 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27607 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Columbus | Ohio | 43210-1250 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73112 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19140 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15215 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Germantown | Tennessee | 38138 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | 75230 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Galveston | Texas | 77555 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Houston | Texas | 77005 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78258 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wichita Falls | Texas | 76301 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84107 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Burlington | Vermont | 05401 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Richmond | Virginia | 23220 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madison | Wisconsin | 53715 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53215 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Capital Federal | Buenos Aires | 1181 | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Buenos Aires | 1425 | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Buenos Aires | C1221ADC | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Curitiba | Paraná | 80069-900 | Brazil |
| GSK Investigational Site | Campinas | São Paulo | 13083-970 | Brazil |
| GSK Investigational Site | São Paulo | São Paulo | 05403-900 | Brazil |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santiago | Región Metro de Santiago | 7571831 | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santiago | Región Metro de Santiago | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Singen | Baden-Wurttemberg | 78224 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ulm | Baden-Wurttemberg | 89073 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Alzenau in Unterfranken | Bavaria | 63755 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bamberg | Bavaria | 96047 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fürth | Bavaria | 90762 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Munich | Bavaria | 80331 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Neuötting | Bavaria | 84524 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Straubing | Bavaria | 94315 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Unterhaching | Bavaria | 82008 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Würzburg | Bavaria | 97070 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bernau bei Berlin | Brandenburg | 16321 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ludwigsfelde | Brandenburg | 14974 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 20249 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 21029 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 22083 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 22523 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | 22527 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bad Homburg | Hesse | 61348 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Frankfurt am Main | Hesse | 60594 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bückeburg | Lower Saxony | 31675 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Göttingen | Lower Saxony | 37075 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Osnabrück | Lower Saxony | 49074 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wismar | Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 23966 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wismar | Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 23970 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Baesweiler | North Rhine-Westphalia | 52499 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44795 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44892 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cologne | North Rhine-Westphalia | 50767 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Essen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 45122 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Essen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 45138 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hattingen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 45525 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Mönchengladbach | North Rhine-Westphalia | 41061 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Münster | North Rhine-Westphalia | 48149 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Limburgerhof | Rhineland-Palatinate | 67117 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Flöha | Saxony | 09557 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Leipzig | Saxony | 04105 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Leipzig | Saxony | 04157 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bernburg | Saxony-Anhalt | 06406 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Halle | Saxony-Anhalt | 06118 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Köthen | Saxony-Anhalt | 06366 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Magdeburg | Saxony-Anhalt | 39104 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Magdeburg | Saxony-Anhalt | 39124 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Naumburg | Saxony-Anhalt | 06618 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kiel | Schleswig-Holstein | 24105 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Berlin | State of Berlin | 10117 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Berlin | State of Berlin | 10969 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Berlin | State of Berlin | 13353 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Jena | Thuringia | 07743 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh | 500482 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lucknow | 226003 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | New Delhi | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kubang Kerian | 16150 | Malaysia |
| GSK Investigational Site | San German | Puerto Rico | 00683 | Puerto Rico |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Juan | Puerto Rico | 00918 | Puerto Rico |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Juan | Puerto Rico | 00936 | Puerto Rico |
| GSK Investigational Site | Moscow | 105066 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Moscow | 107076 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Moscow | 111539 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Moscow | 117049 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Moscow | 119334 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Moscow | 125412 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saint Petersburg | 193019 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saint Petersburg | 194291 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Samara | 443095 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | St'Petersburg | 197136 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Yekaterinburg | 620102 | Russia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Daejeon | 301-721 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | 110-744 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | 120-752 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | 135-710 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Seoul | 139-711 | South Korea |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kharkiv | 61068 | Ukraine |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kyiv | 02660 | Ukraine |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lviv | 79021 | Ukraine |
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| LAM100036 | Study Protocol | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| LAM100036 | Annotated Case Report Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| LAM100036 | Clinical Study Report | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| LAM100036 | Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| LAM100036 | Dataset Specification | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| LAM100036 | Statistical Analysis Plan | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FG002 | Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG | Participants who received placebo in the Double-Blind Phase and then entered the CP, in which they received LTG |
| FG003 | Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG | Participants who received LTG XR in the Double-Blind Phase and then entered the CP, in which they received LTG |
| FG004 | Baseline Failures | Baseline failures who entered the CP without receiving treatment in the Double-Blind Phase. Baseline Failures were participants that successfully progressed through the Screening Phase and completed the Baseline Phase of the Double-blind Study, but ultimately did not meet the seizure frequency criteria for randomization into the Double-Blind Treatment Phase of the study. As a result, they were not counted as having started in the Double-Blind Study, but were eligible to enter the CP of the study. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Continuation Phase |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Double-Blind Phase: Placebo | Control - matching placebo once daily |
| BG001 | Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR | LTG XR once daily |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Baseline measures are on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Four and six participants did not meet the ITT definition in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase Placebo Arm and the Double-Blind Treatment Phase LTG XR Arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Gender | Baseline measures are on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Four and six participants did not meet the ITT definition in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase Placebo Arm and the Double-Blind Treatment Phase LTG XR Arm, respectively. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Baseline measures are on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Four and six participants did not meet the ITT definition in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase Placebo Arm and the Double-Blind Treatment Phase LTG XR Arm, respectively. | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic (PGTC) Seizure Frequency During the Entire Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the Double-Blind Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19) compared to the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 up to Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency. PGTC seizures are more commonly known as gran mal seizures. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who took at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase. One participant in each treatment group did not have any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase. | Posted | Median | Full Range | percent change | Baseline through end of Double-Blind Treatment Phase (up to Week 19) |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, or 100% Reduction in PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Entire Double-Blind (DB)Treatment Phase (TP), the Escalation Phase, the Maintenance Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase | Change in seizure frequency was calculated as the average seizure frequency during each of the following: the Entire DB Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19); the Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7); the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19); and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19), minus the seizure frequency at Baseline. | ITT Population. One participant in each treatment group did not have any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase, as a result they were not counted in this efficacy endpoint; an additional 2 and 1 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR group, respectively, were not counted in the Maintenance Phase (MP) or last 8 weeks of MP due to study withdrawal. | Posted | Number | participants | Entire DB Treatment Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 19), Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Escalation Phase, the Maintenance Phase, and During the Last 8 Weeks of the Maintenance Phase of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and during the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 12 up to Week 19) compared to the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 up to Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency. | ITT Population. One participant in each treatment group did not have any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase as a result they were not counted for this efficacy endpoint; an additional 2 and 1 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR group, respectively, were not counted in the Maintenance Phase (MP) or last 8 weeks of MP due to study withdrawal. | Posted | Median | Full Range | percent change | Escalation Phase (Treatment Week 1 up to Week 7), Maintenance Phase (Treatment Week 8 up to Week 19), and the last 8 weeks of the Maintenance Phase (Week 12 up to Week 19) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to >=50% Reduction in Seizure Frequency in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | 50% reduction in seizure frequency is defined as the time at which a participant first achieved and maintained a >=50% reduction in seizure frequency following exposure to at least 1 week of study drug. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline through end of Double-Blind Treatment Phase (up to Week 19) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Change from baseline in body weight is calculated as the Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) value minus the Baseline value. | ITT Population | Posted | Median | Full Range | kilograms | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Status on the Investigator's Global Assessment in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The investigators rated the participants' overall clinical status based on 7 clinical factors and an overall factor: seizure frequency, duration, and intensity; adverse experiences; social, intellectual, and motor functioning. Using a 7-point scale (marked deterioration [1], moderate deterioration [2], mild deterioration [3], no change [4], mild improvement [5], moderate improvement [6], or marked improvement [7]), the investigators assessed the participants' status compared to their condition prior to initiating study medication. | ITT Population. Overall clinical status not assessed for 2 participants in each of the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 19 (or last on-study assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improved Satisfaction With Seizure Control on the Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with their seizure control compared to their seizure control prior to initiating study drug on a 7 point scale: marked deterioration (1), moderate deterioration (2), mild deterioration (3), no change (4), mild improvement (5), moderate improvement (6), or marked improvement (7). | ITT Population. Participant satisfaction was not assessed for 2 participants in each of the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 19 (or last on-study assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly PGTC Seizure Frequency During the Entire Continuation Phase (CP), the Transition Phase, the Open-Label Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the Open-Label Phase | Percent change from baseline is calculated as the number of seizures by week during the entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) minus the number of seizures per week during the Baseline Phase (Baseline Week 1 through Week 8). A positive number equals a reduction in seizure frequency. | ITT Population for CP: all participants who took at least one dose of study medication during the CP and had at least one post baseline seizure assessment during the CP. Variability in participant numbers are due to not having any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase and study withdrawal prior to progressing to the next phase. | Posted | Median | Full Range | percent change | Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With >=25%, >=50%, >=75%, or 100% Reduction or >=50% Increase From Baseline in Weekly PGTC Seizure Frequency for the Entire Continuation Phase, the Transition Phase, the Open-Label (OL) Phase, and the Last 8 Weeks of the OL Phase. | Change in seizure frequency was calculated as the average seizure frequency during each of the following: the Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52); the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7); the Open-Label (OL) Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52); and the last 8 weeks of the Open Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) minus the seizure frequency at Baseline. W, Week. | ITT Population for CP. Variability in participant numbers are due to not having any PGTC seizures during the Baseline Phase and study withdrawal prior to progressing to the next phase. | Posted | Number | participants | Entire CP (CP Week 1 up to Week 52), the Transition Phase (CP Week 1 up to Week 7), the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 8 up to Week 52), and the last 8 weeks of the Open-Label Phase (CP Week 45 up to Week 52) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood State (POMS) Mood Disturbance Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The POMS is a self-administered 65-item questionnaire that evaluates the participants' perception of their mood state in 6 areas: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), with higher scores indicating a more negative mood state. A total score (from 0 to 24) is obtained by summing the scores of the six domains. | ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 53 and 57 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | points on a scale | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The 20-item CES-D questionnaire is self-administered and asks respondents to report the frequency to which the 20 events were experienced over the past week. A 4-point Likert scale is used and ranges from rarely or none of the time (0) to most or all of the time (3). The total score, a sum across the 20 items (ranging from 0 to 60), determines the extent to which a participant may be experiencing depression. Higher scores indicate a higher severity of depression. | ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 64 and 59 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | points on a scale | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy (NDDI-E) 6-Item Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The NDDI-E is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 46 brief phrases/words to identify mood disorders across the spectrum of depression. It was developed to capture depressive moods that are co-morbid with the disease of epilepsy or its treatment as well as to measure the depressive state of the participant. All phrases are measured on a 4-point Likert scale of Never (1) to Always/often (4) and refer to the participants' mood over the past week. Scoring is comprised of a total mood score calculated by summing the scores of 6 specific items (from 6=never to 24=always or often). | ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 65 participants in both the Placebo and LTG XR groups. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | points on a scale | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31-P (QOLIE-31P) Overall Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The QOLIE-31 is a 31-item questionnaire that evaluates the participants' perception of his or her quality of life in 7 domains: seizure worry, emotional well being, energy/fatigue, cognitive functioning, medication effects, social functioning, and overall quality of life. Each domain (with scores ranging from 0 to 100) is summed and divided by the total number of questions that were answered. The overall score is derived by weighting and then summing up the seven domain scores. | ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 55 participants in both the Placebo and LTG XR groups. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | points on a scale | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Adverse Experience Profile (AEP) Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The AEP is a list of 19 items covering many possible side effects attributable to drug treatment. The participants respond by assessing how much each event has been a problem for them over the past 4 weeks (1=Never a Problem to 4=Always a Problem). Each individual item can be examined; an overall adverse events score is calculated as the sum of the scores across the 19 items. The AEP total score ranges from 19 to 76, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of adverse event severity. | ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 65 participants in both the Placebo and LTG XR groups. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | points on a scale | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Seizure Severity Questionnaire (SSQ) Global Bother Score at Week 19 Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The SSQ is a self-reported instrument developed to assess the severity of seizures and seizure symptoms. The scale consists of 10 major clinical features/symptoms of seizures that the participants rate on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from very mild/helpful/no bother at all [1] to very severe/no help/bothersome [7]). The Global Bother Domain is the primary score used for the analysis of the SSQ and has scores ranging from 1 to 7. | ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 68 and 67 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | points on a scale | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) 8-Item Total Score at Week 19 of the Double-Blind Treatment Phase | The ESS is an 8-item, self-administered questionnaire that measures excessive daytime sleepiness in adults. The instrument captures information on the extent to which the participant would be likely, or not, to fall asleep in certain situations. The stimulus question is: How likely are you to doze off or fall asleep in the following situations, in contrast to feeling just tired? Questions are answered on a 4-point scale (would never doze [0] to high chance of dozing [3]). The total score ranges from 0 to 24, where a higher score indicates a higher chance of dozing. | ITT Population. The questionnaire was not completed by 55 and 51 participants in the Placebo and LTG XR groups, respectively. Only participants completing the questionnaire were included in the analysis of this outcome measure. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | points on a scale | Baseline and Week 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Serum Concentrations and Population (POP) Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Lamotrigine | Serum samples for participants on lamotrigine were analyzed with a validated analytical method based on solid phase extraction of serum followed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Mass Spectrometry (MS)/MS analysis. The lower limit of quantification (LLQ) for serum lamotrigine was 4 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL), using a 50 microliter (µL) aliquot of human serum with a higher limit of quantification (HLQ) of 4,000 ng/mL. PK data cannot be reported, as PK data from several different studies have been combined into one POP/PK analysis and cannot be separated by study. | PK Population: Number of participants analyzed for PK data cannot be reported, as PK data from several different studies have been combined into one POP/PK analysis and cannot be separated by study. | Posted | Blood samples drawn at Treatment Weeks 11, 15, and 19 (or last on-study measurement in Double-Blind Treatment Phase) |
|
|
Not provided
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants in the Safety Population. The Safety Population was defined as all participants who took at least one dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Double-Blind Phase: Placebo | Control - matching placebo once daily | 0 | 74 | 21 | 74 | ||
| EG001 | Double-Blind Phase: LTG XR | Lamotrigine (LTG) extended release (XR) once daily | 1 | 72 | 27 | 72 | ||
| EG002 | Continuation Phase: Placebo/LTG | Participants who received placebo in the Double-Blind Phase and then entered the CP, in which they received LTG | 3 | 69 | 29 | 69 | ||
| EG003 | Continuation Phase: LTG/LTG | Participants who received LTG XR in the Double-Blind Phase and then entered the CP, in which they received LTG | 3 | 67 | 21 | 67 | ||
| EG004 | Baseline Failures | Baseline failures who entered the CP without receiving treatment in the Double-Blind Phase. Baseline Failures were participants that successfully progressed through the Screening Phase and completed the Baseline Phase of the Double-blind Study, but ultimately did not meet the seizure frequency criteria for randomization into the Double-Blind Treatment Phase of the study. As a result, they were not counted as having started in the Double-Blind Study, but were eligible to enter the CP of the study. | 1 | 32 | 18 | 32 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confusional state | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Altered state of consciousness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ataxia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hemiparesis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hydrocephalus | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nystagmus | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope vasovagal | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conversion disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| All rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diplopia | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ataxia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004830 | Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic |
| D012640 | Seizures |
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004829 | Epilepsy, Generalized |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077213 | Lamotrigine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014227 | Triazines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Pregnancy |
|
| Non-compliance |
|
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| White |
|
| American Indian or Alaskan Native and White |
|
| Asian and White |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG002 | Baseline Failures | Baseline failures who entered the CP |
|
|
Baseline failures who entered the CP
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|