Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCRI-FOCUS2 | |||
| MRC-CR09 | |||
| EU-20303 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Leeds | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as leucovorin, fluorouracil, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin, use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin is more effective than capecitabine with or without oxaliplatin in treating patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying four different chemotherapy regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms and receive 12 weeks of therapy.
Patients with disease progression during or within 8 weeks of the completion of this regimen may cross over and receive second-line therapy on arm II.
Patients with disease progression during or within 8 weeks of the completion of this regimen may receive second-line therapy or supportive care off-study.
Patients with disease progression during or within 8 weeks of the completion of this regimen may cross over and receive second-line therapy on arm IV.
Patients with disease progression during or within 8 weeks of the completion of this regimen may receive second-line therapy or supportive care off-study.
All patients are then re-evaluated at least every 6 weeks and begin another 12 weeks of therapy at any evidence (e.g., clinical, radiological, or tumor marker) of disease progression. Patients with chemo-sensitive disease may repeat alternating 12-week therapy sessions and evaluation periods indefinitely.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 12-14 weeks, at 24 weeks, and then every 3 months thereafter.
Patients are followed every 3 months.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 460 patients (115 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MdG (modified de Gramont) | Active Comparator | 2 weekly 5FU/FA schedule |
|
| OxMdG (80%) for 12 weeks | Experimental | MdG + oxaliplatin |
|
| Capcitabine | Experimental |
| |
| OxCap | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLFOX regimen | Drug |
| ||
| capecitabine |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare progression-free survival (PFS) in pts. treated w/ leucovorin calcium + fluorouracil (MdG) vs leucovorin calcium + fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (OxMdG) and in pts. treated w/ capecitabine (Cap) vs capecitabine + oxaliplatin (OxCap) at 1 yr | Compare progression-free survival (PFS) in pts. treated w/ leucovorin calcium + fluorouracil (MdG) vs leucovorin calcium + fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (OxMdG) and in pts. treated w/ capecitabine (Cap) vs capecitabine + oxaliplatin (OxCap) at 1 yr | PFS |
| Compare health assessment in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap at baseline and 14 weeks | Compare health assessment in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap at baseline and 14 weeks | Baseline and 14 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare health assessment, including quality of life, in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap at baseline and 14 and 24 weeks | Compare health assessment, including quality of life, in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap at baseline and 14 and 24 weeks | Baseline, 14 and 24 weeks |
Not provided
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, defined by 1 of the following:
Unidimensionally measurable disease
Unfit and unsuitable for full-dose combination chemotherapy, which would include 1 of the following circumstances:
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
Performance status
Life expectancy
Hematopoietic
Hepatic
Renal
Cardiovascular
Other
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
Chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
Radiotherapy
Surgery
Other
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew T. Seymour, MA, MD, FRCP | Cookridge Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Gareth Griffiths | Medical Research Council | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cookridge Hospital | Leeds | England | LS16 6QB | United Kingdom | ||
| Clinical Trials and Research Unit of the University of Leeds |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21570111 | Result | Seymour MT, Thompson LC, Wasan HS, Middleton G, Brewster AE, Shepherd SF, O'Mahony MS, Maughan TS, Parmar M, Langley RE; FOCUS2 Investigators; National Cancer Research Institute Colorectal Cancer Clinical Studies Group. Chemotherapy options in elderly and frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS2): an open-label, randomised factorial trial. Lancet. 2011 May 21;377(9779):1749-59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60399-1. Epub 2011 May 11. | |
| Result | Seymour MT, Maughan TS, Wasan HS, et al.: Capecitabine (Cap) and oxaliplatin (Ox) in elderly and/or frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the FOCUS2 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-9030, 500s, 2007. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
|
| fluorouracil | Drug |
|
| leucovorin calcium | Drug |
|
| oxaliplatin | Drug |
|
| quality-of-life assessment | Procedure |
|
| Compare toxicity/adverse events in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap | Compare toxicity/adverse events in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap | post 24 weeks |
| Compare overall failure-free survival in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap | Compare overall failure-free survival in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap | post 24 weeks |
| Compare overall survival in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap | Compare overall survival in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap | post 24 weeks |
| Compare health economics in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap | Compare health economics in patients treated with MdG vs OxMdG and in patients treated with Cap vs OxCap | Baseline, 14 and 24 weeks |
| Compare health assessment in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap | Baseline, 14 and 24 weeks |
| Compare toxicity/adverse events in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap at baseline and 24 weeks | Compare toxicity/adverse events in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap at baseline and 24 weeks | Baseline and 24 weeks |
| Compare patients acceptability in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap | Compare patients acceptability in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap | post 24 weeks |
| Compare PFS in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap | Compare PFS in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap | post 24 weeks |
| Compare health economics in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap | Compare health economics in patients treated with MdG vs Cap and in patients treated with OxMdG vs OxCap | Baseline, 14 and 24 weeks |
| Leeds |
| England |
| LS2 9JT |
| United Kingdom |
| Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit | London | England | NW1 2DA | United Kingdom |
| Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital | Cardiff | Wales | CF14 2TL | United Kingdom |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D003110 | Colonic Neoplasms |
| D012004 | Rectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C410216 | Folfox protocol |
| D000069287 | Capecitabine |
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| D002955 | Leucovorin |
| D000077150 | Oxaliplatin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |
| D003853 | Deoxyribonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
| D005575 | Formyltetrahydrofolates |
| D013763 | Tetrahydrofolates |
| D005492 | Folic Acid |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D003067 | Coenzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
| D056831 | Coordination Complexes |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided