Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U10CA012027 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| CDR0000066987 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
RATIONALE: Removing the sentinel lymph nodes and examining them under a microscope may help plan more effective surgery for breast cancer. It is not yet known if surgery to remove the sentinel lymph nodes is more effective with or without removal of the lymph nodes in the armpit in treating breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of surgery to remove the sentinel lymph nodes with or without removal of lymph nodes in the armpit in treating women who have breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES:
Objectives of quality of life questionnaire in sentinel node-negative patients:
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to the surgical treatment plan (lumpectomy vs mastectomy), age (49 and under vs 50 and over), and clinical tumor size (no greater than 2.0 cm vs 2.1-4.0 cm vs at least 4.1 cm). Patients are randomized to one of two surgery arms.
All patients receive technetium (Tc 99m) sulfur colloid injected into normal breast tissue within 1 cm of the primary tumor or biopsy cavity and an intradermal injection of technetium (Tc 99m) sulfur colloid, approximately 0.5-8 hours before surgery. Patients also receive an injection of isosulfan blue dye around the tumor or biopsy cavity after a hot spot is identified with a gamma detector. If a hot spot is not identified, the blue dye is injected after a saline bolus injection.
Patients with positive sentinel nodes undergo axillary dissection after sentinel node resection.
Patients with cytologically negative sentinel nodes do not undergo axillary dissection.
Patients with cytologically negative but histologically positive sentinel nodes return to surgery for axillary dissection.
Patients with histologically positive sentinel nodes and those in whom the sentinel node is not identified undergo axillary dissection after sentinel node resection.
Patients with pathologically positive, nonaxillary sentinel nodes undergo axillary dissection after sentinel node resection.
Patients with evidence of tumor remaining after surgery undergo a total mastectomy.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at weeks 1-3, and then every 6 months for 3 years or until recurrence.
Patients are followed at 1 and 3 weeks, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 5,400 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I: Conventional axillary dissection | Active Comparator | Sentinel node resection immediately followed by axillary dissection |
|
| Arm II: Sentinel node resection followed by node examination | Experimental | Sentinel node resection followed by node examination then axillary dissection if positive sentinel node. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| conventional surgery | Procedure | Sentinel node resection immediately followed by axillary dissection. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Shoulder Abduction Deficit | Morbidity as measured by residual shoulder abduction deficit. Shoulder Abduction Deficit definition: Shoulder range of motion decreased by greater than or equal to 10% as compared with that measured prior to surgery. | Before and after surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
| Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Volume Difference | Morbidity as measured by residual arm volume difference. Residual Arm Volume Difference definition: Arm volume differences greater than or equal to 10% as compared with that measured prior to surgery | before and after surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
| Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Numbness | Morbidity as measured by residual arm numbness | before and after surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
| Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Tingling | Morbidity as measured by residual arm tingling | before and after surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
| Overall Survival | Measured at the time from randomization to any death to determine the percentage of patients alive at 8 years | 8 years |
| Disease-free Survival as Measured by Breast Cancer Recurrence, Any Second Primary Cancer, and Death From Any Cause in Patients Without a Prior Event. | Measured at time from randomization to recurrence, second primary, or death to determine the percentage of patients disease free at 8 years. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic Recurrence | Percentage of patients distant disease-free at 5 years. Sentinel node definition: Sentinel nodes are the first few lymph nodes into which a tumor drains. Sentinel node biopsy requires injecting a tracer material to help a surgeon locate sentinel nodes during surgery. |
Not provided
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Resectable invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast, confirmed by 1 of the following:
Clinically negative lymph nodes
No ulceration, erythema, infiltration of the skin or underlying chest wall (complete fixation), peau d'orange, or skin edema of any magnitude
No bilateral malignancy or mass in the opposite breast that is suspicious for malignancy, unless proven nonmalignant by biopsy
No diffuse tumors or multiple malignant tumors in different quadrants of the breast
No other prior breast malignancy except lobular carcinoma in situ
No prior or concurrent breast implants
Hormone receptor status:
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
Sex:
Menopausal status:
Performance status:
Life expectancy:
Hematopoietic:
Hepatic:
Renal:
Cardiovascular:
Other:
No prior malignancy within past 5 years except:
No concurrent psychiatric or addictive disorder
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
Chemotherapy:
Endocrine therapy:
Radiotherapy:
Surgery:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Norman Wolmark, MD | NSABP Foundation Inc | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBCCOP - Gulf Coast | Mobile | Alabama | 36688 | United States | ||
| University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17991930 | Background | Land SR, Ritter MW, Costantino JP, Julian TB, Cronin WM, Haile SR, Wolmark N, Ganz PA. Compliance with patient-reported outcomes in multicenter clinical trials: methodologic and practical approaches. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 10;25(32):5113-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1749. | |
| 19730364 | Result | Weaver DL, Le UP, Dupuis SL, Weaver KA, Harlow SP, Ashikaga T, Krag DN. Metastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes: comparison of a limited widely spaced (NSABP protocol B-32) and a comprehensive narrowly spaced paraffin block sectioning strategy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Nov;33(11):1583-9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b274e7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm I: Conventional Axillary Dissection | Sentinel node resection immediately followed by axillary dissection conventional surgery: Sentinel node resection immediately followed by axillary dissection. |
| FG001 | Arm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sentinel node resection followed by node examination | Procedure | Sentinel node resection followed by node examination then axillary dissection if positive sentinel node. No axillary dissection for negative sentinel node. |
|
| 8 years |
| From the time of randomization until 5 years |
| Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic Recurrence | Measured at time from randomization to any distant cancer or death to determine percentage of patients distant disease free at 5 years. Sentinel node definition: Sentinel nodes are the first few lymph nodes into which a tumor drains. Sentinel node biopsy requires injecting a tracer material to help a surgeon locate sentinel nodes during surgery. | From the time of randomization until 5 years |
| The Percentage of Technically Successful Sentinel Node Resections as Measured by the Proportion of Patients for Whom at Least One Sentinel Node is Identified. | Sentinel node definition: Sentinel nodes are the first few lymph nodes into which a tumor drains. Sentinel node biopsy requires injecting a tracer material to help a surgeon locate sentinel nodes during surgery. | At time of surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
| Sensitivity of the Sentinel Node to Determine Presence of Nodal Metastases. | Sentinel node definition: Sentinel nodes are the first few lymph nodes into which a tumor drains. Sentinel node biopsy requires injecting a tracer material to help a surgeon locate sentinel nodes during surgery. | At time of surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
| Little Rock |
| Arkansas |
| 72205 |
| United States |
| City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center | Duarte | California | 91010-3000 | United States |
| Loma Linda University Cancer Institute at Loma Linda University Medical Center | Loma Linda | California | 92354 | United States |
| Sutter Breast Cancer Group | Sacramento | California | 95819-5156 | United States |
| Kaiser Permanente Medical Center/Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Diego | San Diego | California | 92120 | United States |
| Stanford Cancer Center at Stanford University Medical Center | Stanford | California | 94305-5408 | United States |
| Hartford Hospital | Hartford | Connecticut | 06102-5037 | United States |
| MBCCOP - Howard University Cancer Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20060 | United States |
| Halifax Medical Center | Daytona Beach | Florida | 32114 | United States |
| Baptist Regional Cancer Institute - Jacksonville | Jacksonville | Florida | 32207 | United States |
| University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| CCOP - Mount Sinai Medical Center | Miami Beach | Florida | 33140 | United States |
| Sarasota Memorial Hospital | Sarasota | Florida | 34239 | United States |
| Cancer Research Center of Hawaii | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96813 | United States |
| MBCCOP-Cook County Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| Creticos Cancer Center at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60657 | United States |
| CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association | Peoria | Illinois | 61602 | United States |
| Methodist Cancer Center at Methodist Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46206-1367 | United States |
| CCOP - Northern Indiana CR Consortium | South Bend | Indiana | 46601 | United States |
| CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association | Des Moines | Iowa | 50309-1016 | United States |
| CCOP - Wichita | Wichita | Kansas | 67214-3882 | United States |
| Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center at Louisiana State University Medical Center - New Orleans | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70112 | United States |
| Tulane University Medical Center | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70112 | United States |
| Eastern Maine Medical Center | Bangor | Maine | 04401 | United States |
| Franklin Square Hospital Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21237 | United States |
| Cancer Research Center at Boston Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02118 | United States |
| University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center - University Campus | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| CCOP - Michigan Cancer Research Consortium | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48106 | United States |
| Josephine Ford Cancer Center at Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| Michigan State University | East Lansing | Michigan | 48824 | United States |
| CCOP - Grand Rapids | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49503 | United States |
| CCOP - Kalamazoo | Kalamazoo | Michigan | 49007-3731 | United States |
| CCOP - Beaumont | Royal Oaks | Michigan | 48073-6769 | United States |
| Providence Cancer Institute at Providence Hospital | Southfield | Michigan | 48075-9975 | United States |
| CCOP - Kansas City | Kansas City | Missouri | 64131 | United States |
| CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium | Billings | Montana | 59101 | United States |
| Methodist Hospital Cancer Center at Nebraska Methodist Hospital - Omaha | Omaha | Nebraska | 68114 | United States |
| Cancer Institute of New Jersey | New Brunswick | New Jersey | 08903 | United States |
| Newark Beth Israel Medical Center | Newark | New Jersey | 07112 | United States |
| New York Oncology Hematology, P.C. - Albany Regional Cancer Center | Albany | New York | 12208 | United States |
| CCOP - Southeast Cancer Control Consortium | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27104-4241 | United States |
| Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest University | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157-1082 | United States |
| CCOP - Merit Care Hospital | Fargo | North Dakota | 58122 | United States |
| Akron City Hospital | Akron | Ohio | 44312 | United States |
| Aultman Hospital Cancer Center at Aultman Health Foundation | Canton | Ohio | 44710 | United States |
| Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati, Incorporated | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45236 | United States |
| Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45267-0502 | United States |
| Ireland Cancer Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106-5065 | United States |
| CCOP - Columbus | Columbus | Ohio | 43206 | United States |
| CCOP - Dayton | Kettering | Ohio | 45429 | United States |
| CCOP - Columbia River Oncology Program | Portland | Oregon | 97213 | United States |
| Geisinger Medical Center | Danville | Pennsylvania | 17822-2001 | United States |
| Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107-5541 | United States |
| Allegheny General Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15212-4772 | United States |
| Reading Hospital and Medical Center | Reading | Pennsylvania | 19612-6052 | United States |
| CCOP - MainLine Health | Wynnewood | Pennsylvania | 19096 | United States |
| CCOP - Upstate Carolina | Spartanburg | South Carolina | 29303 | United States |
| University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas | 78284-7811 | United States |
| Utah Valley Regional Medical Center - Provo | Provo | Utah | 84604 | United States |
| Huntsman Cancer Institute | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84112 | United States |
| Vermont Cancer Center at University of Vermont | Burlington | Vermont | 05401-3498 | United States |
| Virginia Oncology Associates - Newport News | Newport News | Virginia | 23606 | United States |
| MBCCOP - Massey Cancer Center | Richmond | Virginia | 23298-0037 | United States |
| Puget Sound Oncology Consortium | Seattle | Washington | 98109 | United States |
| CCOP - Northwest | Tacoma | Washington | 98405-0986 | United States |
| Camcare Health | Charleston | West Virginia | 25304 | United States |
| Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| Saint John Regional Hospital | Saint John | New Brunswick | E2L 4L2 | Canada |
| Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre | Toronto | Ontario | M4N 3M5 | Canada |
| St. Michael's Hospital - Toronto | Toronto | Ontario | M5B 1W8 | Canada |
| Princess Margaret Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2M9 | Canada |
| Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H2L-4M1 | Canada |
| Royal Victoria Hospital - Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H3A 1A1 | Canada |
| Jewish General Hospital - Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H3T 1E2 | Canada |
| St. Mary's Hospital Center | Montreal | Quebec | H3T 1M5 | Canada |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec | Québec | Quebec | G1R 2J6 | Canada |
| MBCCOP - San Juan | San Juan | 00927-5800 | Puerto Rico |
| Result | Land SR, Kopec JA, Lee M, et al.: Quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving sentinel-node (SN) biopsy alone or with axillary dissection (AD): results from NSABP protocol B-32. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-9533, 2008. |
| Result | Julian TB, Anderson SJ, Fourchotte V, et al.: Is completion axillary dissection always required after a positive sentinel node biopsy? NSABP B-32. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 106 (1): A-51, S15, 2007. |
| Result | Julian TB, Anderson SJ, Fourchotte V, et al.: Is intraoperative cytology of sentinel nodes useful and predictive for non-sentinel axillary nodes? NSABP B-32. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 106 (1): A-3001, 2007. |
| 17851130 | Result | Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Ashikaga T, Weaver DL, Miller BJ, Jalovec LM, Frazier TG, Noyes RD, Robidoux A, Scarth HM, Mammolito DM, McCready DR, Mamounas EP, Costantino JP, Wolmark N; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Oct;8(10):881-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4. |
| Result | Julian B, Fourchotte V, Anderson S, et al.: Predictive factors that identify patients not requiring a sentinel node biopsy: continued analysis of the NSABP B-32 sentinel node trial. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 (Suppl 1): A-2003, S80-1, 2006. |
| 17024757 | Result | Weaver DL, Krag DN, Manna EA, Ashikaga T, Waters BL, Harlow SP, Bauer KD, Julian TB. Detection of occult sentinel lymph node micrometastases by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer. An NSABP protocol B-32 quality assurance study. Cancer. 2006 Aug 15;107(4):661-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22074. |
| 15621990 | Result | Harlow SP, Krag DN, Julian TB, Ashikaga T, Weaver DL, Feldman SA, Klimberg VS, Kusminsky R, Moffat FL Jr, Noyes RD, Beitsch PD. Prerandomization Surgical Training for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000149429.39656.94. |
| 21247310 | Derived | Weaver DL, Ashikaga T, Krag DN, Skelly JM, Anderson SJ, Harlow SP, Julian TB, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):412-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008108. Epub 2011 Jan 19. |
| 20863759 | Derived | Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, Ashikaga T, Weaver DL, Mamounas EP, Jalovec LM, Frazier TG, Noyes RD, Robidoux A, Scarth HM, Wolmark N. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):927-33. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2. |
Sentinel node resection followed by node examination then axillary dissection if positive sentinel node. Sentinel node resection followed by node examination: Sentinel node resection followed by node examination then axillary dissection if positive sentinel node. No axillary dissection for negative sentinel node. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Conventional Axillary Dissection | Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Conventional Axillary Dissection |
| BG001 | Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination | Sentinel node resection followed by node examination |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Shoulder Abduction Deficit | Morbidity as measured by residual shoulder abduction deficit. Shoulder Abduction Deficit definition: Shoulder range of motion decreased by greater than or equal to 10% as compared with that measured prior to surgery. | Data missing or unknown for some patients | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Before and after surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Volume Difference | Morbidity as measured by residual arm volume difference. Residual Arm Volume Difference definition: Arm volume differences greater than or equal to 10% as compared with that measured prior to surgery | Data missing or unknown for some patients. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | before and after surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Numbness | Morbidity as measured by residual arm numbness | Data missing or unknown for some patients | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | before and after surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Tingling | Morbidity as measured by residual arm tingling | Data missing or unknown for some patients | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | before and after surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Overall Survival | Measured at the time from randomization to any death to determine the percentage of patients alive at 8 years | Data missing or unknown for some patients | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of patients alive at 8 years | 8 years |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Disease-free Survival as Measured by Breast Cancer Recurrence, Any Second Primary Cancer, and Death From Any Cause in Patients Without a Prior Event. | Measured at time from randomization to recurrence, second primary, or death to determine the percentage of patients disease free at 8 years. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage pts disease free at 8 years | 8 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic Recurrence | Percentage of patients distant disease-free at 5 years. Sentinel node definition: Sentinel nodes are the first few lymph nodes into which a tumor drains. Sentinel node biopsy requires injecting a tracer material to help a surgeon locate sentinel nodes during surgery. | Data missing or unknown for some patients. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | From the time of randomization until 5 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic Recurrence | Measured at time from randomization to any distant cancer or death to determine percentage of patients distant disease free at 5 years. Sentinel node definition: Sentinel nodes are the first few lymph nodes into which a tumor drains. Sentinel node biopsy requires injecting a tracer material to help a surgeon locate sentinel nodes during surgery. | Data missing or unknown for some patients | Posted | Number | percentage distant disease free at 5 yrs | From the time of randomization until 5 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Percentage of Technically Successful Sentinel Node Resections as Measured by the Proportion of Patients for Whom at Least One Sentinel Node is Identified. | Sentinel node definition: Sentinel nodes are the first few lymph nodes into which a tumor drains. Sentinel node biopsy requires injecting a tracer material to help a surgeon locate sentinel nodes during surgery. | Data missing or unknown for some patients. In Arm I, 19 patients did not accept the protocol and another 42 patients did not have a SLN resection leaving 2746 with a SLN resection. In Arm II, 4 declined the protocol treatment and another 10 patients did not have a SLN resection leaving 2790 with a SLN resection. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At time of surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sensitivity of the Sentinel Node to Determine Presence of Nodal Metastases. | Sentinel node definition: Sentinel nodes are the first few lymph nodes into which a tumor drains. Sentinel node biopsy requires injecting a tracer material to help a surgeon locate sentinel nodes during surgery. | Data not collected for some patients. This analysis as pre-specified in the approved B-32 protocol required that both a SLN resection and an ALND be performed. The patients in Arm II were assigned to have no ALND so were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At time of surgery (within 30 days of randomization) |
|
Not provided
Participants at Risk includes any patient who submitted an AE form.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Conventional Axillary Dissection | Conventional axillary dissection | 0 | 2,788 | 9 | 2,788 | 0 | 2,788 |
| EG001 | Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination | Sentinel node resection followed by node examination | 1 | 2,800 | 8 | 2,800 | 0 | 2,800 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaphylaxis | Immune system disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infections and infestations - Other, specify | Infections and infestations | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nervous system disorders - Other, specify | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders - Other, specify | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thromboembolic event | Vascular disorders | CTCAE v4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director, Department of Regulatory Affairs | NSABP Foundation, Inc | 412-339-5300 | regulatory@nsabp.org |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|